Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Connection
The Weekly Standard ^ | 5/28/04 | Stephen Hayes

Posted on 05/28/2004 3:14:19 PM PDT by martinaricejr

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

1 posted on 05/28/2004 3:14:20 PM PDT by martinaricejr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: martinaricejr
The connection between Saddam and al Qaeda isn't one of them.

It never was to the layman who hasn't overshot his sensibilities by being in a position of political power.

2 posted on 05/28/2004 3:18:34 PM PDT by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martinaricejr
More:

Report Details Saddam's Support for Terrorists Who Killed Americans

The above link is the FreeRepublic discussion thread.

The actual article is :

"Saddam Hussein’s Philanthropy of Terror"

It is a pdf document with substantial footnotes and put together by Dewey Murdock of the Hudson Institute.

3 posted on 05/28/2004 3:21:34 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (The terrorists and their supporters declared war on the United States - and war is what they got!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS

Hayes's book is available at amazon. Get it.


4 posted on 05/28/2004 3:22:22 PM PDT by randita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: martinaricejr

Eeeek. Screeech. The holy men of al-Qaeda and the secular Ba'athists of Iraq could NEVER overcome their differences sufficiently to combine forces and strike at the US. We have it on good authority from the great luminaries of the American Left tradition, that this could not happen, under any circumstances.

This is OBVIOUSLY only a figment of the imagination of the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy.


5 posted on 05/28/2004 3:31:05 PM PDT by alloysteel (Live well and prosper. Beam me up, Scottie....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martinaricejr
When it comes to Al Qaeda, it is vital that they not know what the U.S. government knows.

Anything they may learn from us would be a tipoff that could allow terrorists to adjust their plans and succeed in carrying out an attack that could cost tens of thousands of American lives and perhaps result in the utter destruction of a major U.S. city.

That's why they won't talk about this publicly -- yet.

As the President has repeatedly said: this is a new kind of war.

History will judge President Bush far more fairly than the Leftists do today.

6 posted on 05/28/2004 3:32:22 PM PDT by Imal (Enough of this! Let's hear more about Abu Ghraib.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mitchell

ping


7 posted on 05/28/2004 3:34:52 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martinaricejr

A MUST read.


8 posted on 05/28/2004 3:45:53 PM PDT by the Real fifi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martinaricejr

well done


9 posted on 05/28/2004 3:46:15 PM PDT by bitt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Peach

Add to list:

http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1144123/posts


10 posted on 05/28/2004 3:52:42 PM PDT by Peach (The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: martinaricejr
Bump Bang.
11 posted on 05/28/2004 4:00:14 PM PDT by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Imal

Less than two months before 9/11/01, the state-controlled Iraqi newspaper “Al-Nasiriya” carried a column headlined, “American, an Obsession called Osama Bin Ladin.” (July 21, 2001)

In the piece, Baath Party writer Naeem Abd Muhalhal predicted that bin Laden would attack the US “with the seriousness of the Bedouin of the desert about the way he will try to bomb the Pentagon after he destroys the White House.”

The same state-approved column also insisted that bin Laden “will strike America on the arm that is already hurting,” and that the US “will curse the memory of Frank Sinatra every time he hears his songs” – an apparent reference to the Sinatra classic, “New York, New York”.

That and other links here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1127451/posts


12 posted on 05/28/2004 4:01:40 PM PDT by Peach (The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

I think these reporters are going to be on Meet the Press tomorrow morning.


13 posted on 05/28/2004 4:02:08 PM PDT by Peach (The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Peach

You mean Sunday morning? At least if it's on Russert, the leftists might see it.


14 posted on 05/28/2004 4:06:00 PM PDT by Inkie (Surround Fallujia and start shooting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Inkie

I think I read the reporters would be on Sunday's MTP. I could have misunderstood, however. I'm setting the VCR.


15 posted on 05/28/2004 4:08:54 PM PDT by Peach (The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: martinaricejr

Interesting, but it won't fit on a bumper sticker.


16 posted on 05/28/2004 4:13:20 PM PDT by struwwelpeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martinaricejr
Any questions!
17 posted on 05/28/2004 4:33:17 PM PDT by mattdono (Big Arnie: "Crush the democrats, drive them before you, and hear the lamentations of the scumbags.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Bump


18 posted on 05/28/2004 5:06:08 PM PDT by Lyford
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martinaricejr

Hey libs it's easy to dismiss these reports of collusion between Hussein and Al-Qaeda. Just close your eyes, put your hands over your ears, and when anyone tries to relate facts to you, just shout nonsense syllables or words like "enron" "halliburton" "war for oil" and other handy lib talking points at the top of your lungs. This method should prove effective when some nasty conservative provides overwhelming proof of Hussein's ties to international terrorism and Al-Qaeda.


19 posted on 05/28/2004 5:19:45 PM PDT by driftless ( For life-long happiness, learn how to play the accordion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martinaricejr; Howlin
Newsweek magazine ran an article in its January 11, 1999, issue headed "Saddam + Bin Laden?" "Here's what is known so far,"....

Four days later, on January 15, 1999, ABC News ....

NPR reporter Mike Shuster interviewed Vincent Cannistraro.....

By mid-February 1999, journalists did not even feel the need to qualify these claims of an Iraq-al Qaeda relationship. An Associated Press dispatch that ran in the Washington Post ended this way: "The Iraqi President Saddam Hussein has offered asylum to bin Laden, who openly supports Iraq against Western powers."

The collective amnesia of the press is astounding.

These quotes are (I assume) undeniable and, as such, this has GOT to get out to the public.

And it can't just be a review at Fox News....
the left will just blow it off and bury it.

This is a job for Chaney....

"Since all this fine, investigative journalism matched the intelligence we were receiving both internally and externally, we felt that we had no choice but to act preemptively before this threat became imminent."

20 posted on 05/28/2004 6:04:21 PM PDT by eddie willers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson