Skip to comments.
Kerry accuses Bush of having "Rushed Off to War"
Reuters ^
| 5/28/2004
| Thomas Ferraro
Posted on 05/28/2004 1:15:53 PM PDT by plain talk
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-66 next last
To: stillnoprotestsagainstmuslims
To: plain talk
Dubya is taking the battle to people and places who support terrorism.
We HAD a President that did nothing (except humidor an intern) and look where that got us.
While Britain was fighting Hitler ALONE, and Wavell had troops in Greece, Crete, and against Rommel in Libya, he wiped out a revolt in Iraq and conquered Syria. Later that year, Britain and Russia walked into Iran and stabilized the place while Hitler was invading Russia and besieging Tobruk. Yet now people think that Iraq and Afghanistan at one time is an overreach for us. What a freaking joke!
42
posted on
05/28/2004 2:00:54 PM PDT
by
You Dirty Rats
(WE WILL WIN WITH W - Isara)
To: plain talk
Aw Ketchupman, if the Pres. knew that you were interested, he would have drafted you. Now you're upset because he went without you. Sorry ole man, better luck next time.
43
posted on
05/28/2004 2:00:59 PM PDT
by
lilylangtree
(Veni, Vidi, Vici)
To: stillnoprotestsagainstmuslims
Bizarre - he flips and flops in my mozilla browser - not in my msie browser.
44
posted on
05/28/2004 2:02:35 PM PDT
by
adam_az
(Call your State Republican Party office and VOLUNTEER!!!!)
To: plain talk
I'm really, really, really beginning to dislike this guy.
I stared disliking him before I disliked him.
45
posted on
05/28/2004 2:04:04 PM PDT
by
steveyp
To: steveyp
Bottom line with Kerry in the WH: war on terror is effectively over.
46
posted on
05/28/2004 2:06:28 PM PDT
by
Williams
To: plain talk
This Reuters article is very interesting. It mentions two facts that one would not ordinarily expect to see:
1. It mentions that Kerry voted for the war, and
2. It mentions that Kerry has no plan for Iraq.
Is this just token objectivity? Or has there been a change in policy?
47
posted on
05/28/2004 2:07:33 PM PDT
by
Spok
To: plain talk
48
posted on
05/28/2004 2:07:47 PM PDT
by
ladyinred
(The leftist media is the enemy within.)
To: NormsRevenge
So that's where F'n gets the hand jive action.
49
posted on
05/28/2004 2:08:27 PM PDT
by
don-o
(Stop Freeploading. Do the right thing and sign up for a monthly donation.)
To: plain talk
What Kerry claims is "common sense" is nonsense. First, there would have been no war if we waited for Germany and France. Second, even with their whole hearted support those countries could not offset the military burden of the U.S. Third, why would the U.S. not act unless those corrupt countries approve?
50
posted on
05/28/2004 2:09:38 PM PDT
by
Williams
To: plain talk
Honestly, sometimes I can't tell the difference between Al Gore and John Kerry.
51
posted on
05/28/2004 2:10:32 PM PDT
by
smiley
To: Southack
As part of their "hope for a scandal" against Bush strategy to win, the Democrats are now simply throwing mud up against the wall, hoping that something sticks. This is amateurish politics. Or maybe they are amateurishly throwing mud against the wall, full well knowing that none of this is going to stick.
Isn't McAuliffe in charge of all of this and aren't only two Kerry guys on his staff?
To: Shermy
Just think of al Querry's allies as FGR.
FGR = France, Germany, Russia.
53
posted on
05/28/2004 2:24:00 PM PDT
by
Grampa Dave
( WHAT DID MICHAEL MOORE KNOW ABOUT NICK BERG? WHEN DID HE KNOW IT?)
To: plain talk
Makes no sense at all. But then, logic is clearly absent in the dem mind.
54
posted on
05/28/2004 2:28:41 PM PDT
by
OldFriend
(LOSERS quit when they are tired/WINNERS quit when they have won)
To: Williams
Bottom line with Kerry in the WH: war on terror is effectively over.
No. It moves closer to our own back yards....Denver, Kansas City, Dallas, and numerous points in between.
55
posted on
05/28/2004 2:30:26 PM PDT
by
TomGuy
(Clintonites have such good hind-sight because they had their heads up their hind-ends 8 years.)
To: Spok
2. It mentions that Kerry has no plan for Iraq.
Kerry doesn't have much of a plan for anything. Whenever an interviewer asks, the response, whether direct for Kerry or through his surrogates, never gives any specific details. All they have is "well, George Bush is bad..."
The interviewers let it go. They don't call Kerry or the surrogates on sidestepping.
Kerry and surrogates patterned response [almost a direct quote, if you listen closely]: Kerry has a plan, but George Bush is bad...blah blah blah.
56
posted on
05/28/2004 2:36:04 PM PDT
by
TomGuy
(Clintonites have such good hind-sight because they had their heads up their hind-ends 8 years.)
To: plain talk
There you have it folks-right from Kerry's very own blow hole. If Kerry had been President, we would still be waiting for the profiteering UN and it's oil for food fellow conspirators, to give up their gold mine and join us or at least lend us their blessings to defend ourselves from the world wide web of radical islamite terrorists.
Our enemies need Kerry, like Adolph Hitler and his Nazis needed Nevile Chamberlin. We need Kerry like Great Britian needed Chamberlin.
Barnum and Bailey needs Kerry. Clowns belong in the circus.
57
posted on
05/28/2004 2:36:14 PM PDT
by
F.J. Mitchell
(Every functional brain in America is a threat to Kerry's Presidential aspirations.)
To: smiley
Honestly, sometimes I can't tell the difference between Al Gore and John Kerry.
That's easy. When comparing the two, Gore is the more charismatic one.
58
posted on
05/28/2004 2:38:22 PM PDT
by
TomGuy
(Clintonites have such good hind-sight because they had their heads up their hind-ends 8 years.)
To: plain talk
"I believe our troops are in greater danger today, exposed to more gun fire and more mortar attacks and more ambushes than they had to be if we had done what common sense dictates ... which is to build alliances and share the responsibilities," Kerry said. This makes no logical sense whatsoever.
To: stillnoprotestsagainstmuslims
Stop the animation-it makes me dizzy-but it's oh so true.
It's so true that it has become obvious why Kerry has not named a Veep. Kerry, unlike the Clinton's who proclaimed two for the price of one, plans to offer one for the price of two. Kerry plans to run for both President and Vice President; with flip serving as President and flop serving as Vice President.
60
posted on
05/28/2004 2:48:52 PM PDT
by
F.J. Mitchell
(Every functional brain in America is a threat to Kerry's Presidential aspirations.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-66 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson