Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Randall Terry: "My Prodigal Son, the Homosexual, Part 2"
WND.com ^ | 05-28-04 | Terry, Randall

Posted on 05/28/2004 7:45:07 AM PDT by Theodore R.

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last
To: Theodore R.
Yes, Randall Terry is a Christian who has failed to meet the standard set by Christ. Who hasn't?

I have never been unfaithful to my wife. Have you been unfaithful to your wife.

Who hasn't? Right

I have a cousin that is gay and a good friend from high school. Both are successful and honest people who have been faithful to their partner's for years and years.

Mr. Terry made a vow to God and he like Bill Clinton violated that vow.

41 posted on 05/28/2004 3:40:15 PM PDT by pete anderson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: *Homosexual Agenda; EdReform; scripter; GrandMoM; backhoe; Yehuda; Clint N. Suhks; saradippity; ...
Ping. I don't have the time to provide lj's excellent commentary on each article, so I'm just pinging as I find 'em.

Homosexual Agenda: Categorical Index of Links (Version 1.1)
Homosexual Agenda: Categorical Index of Links (Version 1.0)
Homosexual Agenda Index (bump list)
Homosexual Agenda Keyword Search

42 posted on 05/30/2004 7:32:35 AM PDT by scripter (Thousands have left the homosexual lifestyle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fr_freak

Bumping your post.


43 posted on 05/30/2004 12:02:56 PM PDT by tuesday afternoon (Honour thy father and thy mother, that thy days may be long upon the land)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: The Ghost of FReepers Past
Let me see if I understand you correctly. Your desire for 'homosexuals' is that they all be saved and changed (cured) so that they can be the people that God intended them to be, fathers, husbands, etc. Living Godly lives free from sexual addiction. Is this correct?

However, if they refuse to be saved and changed then you'd rather they die now before they hurt anyone else. Is this also correct?

That's kind of the definition of God's love (and of love the sinner hate the sin). God loves us and wants the best for us but if we refuse to receive it then He will put us into situations where we will be apt to call on Him. (Diseases like AIDS maybe for the 'homosexual'). And unfortunately many times He's forced to remove us before we hurt others. It pains Him to send them to hell but sending one to hell is far better than sending that one and the 100's of others that he led dragged into hell with him.

44 posted on 06/01/2004 5:16:38 AM PDT by John O (God Save America (Please))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King
I wonder if the son rejecting traditional values has anything to do with his dad trading in his mom for a newer model.

Hey, you weren't supposed to notice that!

45 posted on 06/01/2004 5:22:03 AM PDT by Poohbah (Four thousand throats may be cut in a single night by a running man -- Kahless the Unforgettable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy; Catspaw
I thought you were sort of anti- those who make moral judgment anyhow as a rule? Palpatine/OPH always pinged you and Poohbah to his railings against the Christian Right.....(damn, I thought he'd be back by now.) Anyhow....it is hypocritical of Terry, I agree but I'm not sure I'd toss him in the same cesspool with Klintoon.

I would. Mr. Terry is completely unrecondite. He expects all and sundry to affirm his moral turpitude as the right thing.

When I was a young jarhead, I was taught that I had to lead my Marines by my example.

I take my marriage seriously. I am a "one life, one wife" kind of guy. I expect those who claim the mantle of leadership in the Christian community to do likewise.

The Christian Right has done far more damage to the Gospel and to conservative politics than they've done good. They passed their culminating point (the Clausewitzian way of saying they "jumped the shark") in the mid-1980s. Now, their specialty is giving scandal to the Gospel and getting the more liberal of two candidates elected out of spite.

46 posted on 06/01/2004 5:29:12 AM PDT by Poohbah (Four thousand throats may be cut in a single night by a running man -- Kahless the Unforgettable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: John O
No, you do not even come close to understanding me correctly.

My personal desire is that homosexuals will keep their lifestyles as advertised when they argued before the Supreme Court to overturn the sodomy laws -- PRIVATE!

As far as scripture goes, God will send all unreprentant sinners to hell. Homosexuality is a sin. Those who practice it need to repent or face God's judgement.

Personally, I do not "love" the sinner -- as in feel an emotional affection for -- and hate the sin. My emotional response is more one of resentment. I resent the fact that gays want to force everyone else (including BOY SCOUTS for gosh sakes) to approve of their deviant lifestyle through force of government and social pressure. I resent GLSEN for their efforts to pander this crap to school children. I resent LAMBDA Legal for abusing the court system. I have no emotional affection for these people. If they were to change their ways, I would work to forgive them. That's all that's required of me from a scriptural perspective. I stand ready to forgive if they turn from their wicked ways.

That's what I was saying.

47 posted on 06/01/2004 7:09:07 AM PDT by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Legislatures are so outdated. If you want real political victory, take your issue to court.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: John O

I did love my niece -- as in have an emotional affection for -- who was trapped in the gay lifestyle. I loved her long before, and later, in spite of, her deviant lifestyle. I loved her before and in spite of her dishonesty and thievery too. I did not approve of her behavior. She will have to answer to God for that. But I did love her entirely in the human sense. My love for her in the godly sense should have been greater. Maybe then I would have worked harder at helping her out of her destructive lifestyle before it was too late.


48 posted on 06/01/2004 7:14:57 AM PDT by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Legislatures are so outdated. If you want real political victory, take your issue to court.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: The Ghost of FReepers Past
Personally, I do not "love" the sinner -- as in feel an emotional affection for -- and hate the sin.

...

That's what I was saying.

I understand what you're saying. I feel much the same way. What I was getting at however is that 'love' (as used in this discussion at least) is not a 'feeling'. It is not emotional affection. It is a decision to want the best for someone else. We decide to love the sinner because God commands us to love one another. Sometimes that love requires us to seek their health and sometimes that love (for yet others) requires us to seek their deaths. But we always deep down want the best for them.

I have a brother who is trapped in sodomy. I love him because God commands me to and he is my brother. I hate him because of what he does and what he believes. The two are not exclusive (The exact opposite of love is apathy not hatred)

49 posted on 06/01/2004 8:12:57 AM PDT by John O (God Save America (Please))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah

I agree about walking the talk.

I'm happy to see you've become concerned with Social Conservatism.


50 posted on 06/01/2004 8:50:13 AM PDT by wardaddy (This is it. We either win and prevail or we lose and get tossed into that dustbin W mentioned!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy

I always have been concerned with social conservatism--far more, I daresay, than the loudmouthed self-proclaimed purveyors and guardians of social conservatism.


51 posted on 06/01/2004 8:57:40 AM PDT by Poohbah (Four thousand throats may be cut in a single night by a running man -- Kahless the Unforgettable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: John O
When Christians say to a general audience, "We love homosexuals," I think it sounds silly. We look ridiculous because to most people, love is an emotional affection. Now you probably have an emotional affection for your brother that has nothing to do with his homosexuality. So you do love him as the world defines love. But to say you "love" homosexuals to a secular audience is a self-defeating statement. In general terms, it is false.

I do not personally want anyone's death in this matter. I am very sad when they get diseases and die. I know they did it to themselves. But it still grieves me. I know God is just and I trust Him. But I am not happy when it happens.

I agree that God's love is not a feeling. That really was my point too. Godly love is about what you do, not what you feel. In context, however, that is not how the world perceives the statement. From God's perspective, those of us who are fighting against the gay agenda are actually acting more loving toward homosexuals than those who join their cause. Love must sometimes side with what is best for a person, not just what makes the person feel good for the moment. God disciplines the son he delights in, to make him better. His correction of us is a display of His love for us. We do the same for our own children. It is hard to define a greater love than the love of a parent for his child. Yet the most loving parent is the one who gently corrects and instructs his child in ways that are right and good.

This is not untrue of other love relationships. You do not show genuine love by enabling a friend, family member, whomever, to continue in self-destructive ways.

Follow?

52 posted on 06/01/2004 10:14:03 AM PDT by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Legislatures are so outdated. If you want real political victory, take your issue to court.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: The Ghost of FReepers Past
Now you probably have an emotional affection for your brother that has nothing to do with his homosexuality. So you do love him as the world defines love.

With the exception of the above I agreed with everything you said. As I suspected, but wanted to be clear for the lurkers who may be following the conversation, we were discussing and understanding the same issue.

Have a great day and may God Bless you.

53 posted on 06/02/2004 4:38:54 AM PDT by John O (God Save America (Please))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson