Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Seattle: Group running a newspaper ad called "The Day After Kyoto"
Seattle Times ^ | 5-28-2004 | Sandi Doughton

Posted on 05/28/2004 5:39:27 AM PDT by Trailer Trash

Disaster film has scientists laughing

By Sandi Doughton
Seattle Times staff reporter

Slouched in their seats and munching popcorn, a group of climate scientists from the University of Washington pronounced their verdict on the Hollywood blockbuster "The Day After Tomorrow" with giggles and guffaws.

When star Dennis Quaid, playing a hunky paleoclimatologist, solemnly warns that a massive storm unleashed by global warming is going to plunge the Northern Hemisphere into a new Ice Age ? within days! ? the real experts nudge each other and snicker.

When helicopters freeze midair and the Atlantic Ocean swamps Manhattan, peals of laughter erupt.

And this from people who firmly believe the movie's underlying contention is true: That climate change is real and will alter the face of the planet.

"If it raises awareness of the issue, I guess it's a good thing," climatologist David Battisti said, searching for a broader meaning after the lights came up on the advance screening Wednesday.

Then he chuckled. "It's so absurd, I don't think anybody will take it seriously."

There is a "small kernel" of scientific truth in the movie's plot, which blames melting polar ice caps for disrupting ocean currents that warm the northern latitudes, said Mike Wallace, director of the UW's Joint Institute for the Study of the Atmosphere and Ocean.

But that kernel is wildly distorted in a movie that depicts simultaneous tornadoes in Los Angeles, football-sized hail in Tokyo and snowstorms in New Delhi, he said.

Of course, moviegoers don't expect realism in a $125 million, special-effects extravaganza from director Roland Emmerich, whose previous story lines featured an alien invasion in "Independence Day" and a giant mutant lizard in the remake of "Godzilla."

What is surprising is the political heft the movie has acquired even before today's official opening.

Environmentalists and liberal activists have joined forces with former Vice President Al Gore to capitalize on the film and use it as a platform to criticize President Bush for resisting controls on greenhouse gas emissions.

This weekend, volunteers across the country will pass out leaflets at theaters where the movie is premiering.

"We all agree the movie is fictional, but it opens the door to talk about the serious subject of climate change and how it's already affecting us," said Seattle organizer Lisa Maschmeier.

Fearful that images of New York City encased in ice might nudge public opinion toward stronger environmental regulation, conservative and business groups have launched a counter-offensive.

For them, the worst-case scenario is approval of a bill to cap carbon-dioxide emissions that was defeated in the Senate by eight votes last fall. Co-sponsor John McCain, R-Ariz., told the Environment and Energy Daily he hopes the movie will provide needed momentum to pass the measure, which is similar to the international Kyoto accords the Bush administration spurned.

"We're trying to let people know ? in a tongue-in-cheek way ? that what the environmental left is pursuing is very dangerous from a job and economics perspective," said Karen Kerrigan, co-chair of the United for Jobs Coalition. The group is running a newspaper ad called "The Day After Kyoto" that parodies the movie with a picture of an unemployment line and a litany of economic losses that pollution controls could trigger.

And Emmerich, who makes no secret of his disdain for the Bush administration, gives the movie an unabashedly leftward spin. His characters include a weak president dominated by a vice president who sneers at scientists' warnings ? and is a dead ringer for Vice President Dick Cheney.

Any scientific resemblance to the truth resides in a theory, first proposed 17 years ago, that global warming could shut down the so-called conveyer belt ocean currents that transport heat and salinity around the globe and help moderate the climate across much of Europe.

Ice core studies suggest that an outpouring of freshwater from melting glaciers 15,000 years ago might have knocked out the conveyor belt, leading to an "abrupt" change back to a frigid climate ? that is, over the course of decades or a century.

There's some evidence that a similar process may be going on now, as higher temperatures in the Arctic are sending more melt water into the ocean and increasing precipitation, Wallace said.

A 2002 report from the National Academy of Sciences cautioned that unexpected climate shifts were possible, and a Pentagon report issued this year went further, predicting that the most extreme possible changes could lead to droughts, forest fires, blizzards and regional wars over dwindling resources.

But most scientists point out that the amount of freshwater going into the ocean today is puny compared to events in the historic record. Other studies, including some by Battisti, suggest that changes in the conveyor belt probably wouldn't trigger the kind of cooling previously thought.

"Nobody thinks this scenario in the movie is going to happen," he said.

Which doesn't mean global climate won't change dramatically, the scientists say ? just that it will happen gradually, and not necessarily in ways depicted in the movie.

But could a mere movie really move the meter of public opinion enough to affect the future?

Not a movie this farcical, Battisti predicts.

Kerrigan agrees, but says she can't quite forget The China Syndrome. The 1979 dramatization of a nuclear power plant accident was released shortly before the partial meltdown at the Three Mile Island nuclear reactor. Since then, the United States hasn't approved a single new nuclear power plant.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: climatechange; dayaftertommorow; moviereview
Right on!

I wonder though........ If these guys buy this ad 30 days before the McCain Kyoto type bill, is it considered a campaign finance violation? /sic

1 posted on 05/28/2004 5:39:28 AM PDT by Trailer Trash
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Trailer Trash
Why is junk like this movie OK, but Gibson's "The Passion . . " is panned as not being "accurate"?
2 posted on 05/28/2004 5:43:48 AM PDT by jeffc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trailer Trash

"One picture is worth a thousand lies" - anonymous American advertiser


3 posted on 05/28/2004 5:45:21 AM PDT by an amused spectator (The SeeBS of 2004 would have revealed the precise date and location of the Normandy Invasion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trailer Trash
Co-sponsor John McCain, R-Ariz., told the Environment and Energy Daily he hopes the movie will provide needed momentum to pass the measure, which is similar to the international Kyoto accords the Bush administration spurned.

Revised: Co-sponsor John McCain, R-Ariz., noted Campaign Finance Reform expert, told the Environment and Energy Daily he hopes the movie will provide needed momentum to pass the measure, which is similar to the international Kyoto accords the Bush administration spurned, and will do for the environment what his legislation did for CFR.

4 posted on 05/28/2004 5:47:54 AM PDT by an amused spectator (The SeeBS of 2004 would have revealed the precise date and location of the Normandy Invasion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trailer Trash

5 posted on 05/28/2004 5:49:22 AM PDT by bmwcyle (<a href="http://www.johnkerry.com/" target="_blank">miserable failure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trailer Trash

I think most Americans view it as I do.

When the "experts" can predict accurately the weather five days from today, then I "might" consider what they predict is going to happen One Hundred and Fifty Years From Now.

To date, the "experts" are no more accurate than Poor Richards Almanac.


6 posted on 05/28/2004 5:53:10 AM PDT by Badeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: an amused spectator

Revision: John McCain,RINO-Az ...


7 posted on 05/28/2004 5:57:04 AM PDT by stremba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Trailer Trash

> What is surprising is the political heft the movie has acquired even before today's official opening.

This movie is the secular Left's doctrinal statement, as "Passion" was to (much of) the Right. The difference between the two movies is that this one is pure fiction. The commonality between them is that in both cases it is the Left that is driving the publicity - in Mel's case that publicity was negative, in this case it is positive.

Further irrefutable evidence that the Left owns the media.


8 posted on 05/28/2004 6:03:46 AM PDT by Paul_B
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul_B

Thee was a NASA spokesman on a radio show in Houston a few weeks ago discussing this movie. He said this technically is possible, it will just take millions of years to happen.


9 posted on 05/28/2004 6:07:22 AM PDT by minmospop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: stremba; an amused spectator
Revision: John McCain,RINO-Az ...

Revision 2: John McCain, D-Media

Now it's right.

10 posted on 05/28/2004 6:13:10 AM PDT by CFC__VRWC (The media's mouth keeps moving but all I hear is Blah-Blah-Blah!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Trailer Trash; newgeezer
"We all agree the movie is fictional, but it opens the door to talk about the serious subject of climate change and how it's already affecting us," said Seattle organizer Lisa Maschmeier.

And to think just a month ago it was the Passion "opening the door to talk". So much for movie inspired talk and change of heart.

11 posted on 05/28/2004 6:18:10 AM PDT by biblewonk (WELL I SPEAK LOUD, AND I CARRY A BIGGER STICK...AND I USE IT TOO.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: minmospop

Perhaps then we can relax about helicopters freezing in midair, eh?


12 posted on 05/28/2004 6:19:48 AM PDT by Paul_B
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: CFC__VRWC

I liked the Japanese version with the big lizard at lot better.


13 posted on 05/28/2004 6:20:59 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (STAGMIRE !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Trailer Trash

Maybe McCain can go see the movie "Zombies of the Night," and pass a bill forbidding the eating of brains.


14 posted on 05/28/2004 6:24:00 AM PDT by sergeantdave (Gen. Custer wore an Arrowsmith shirt to his last property owner convention.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trailer Trash

Another Gorezilla movie.
wonderful


15 posted on 05/28/2004 7:00:21 AM PDT by greasepaint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trailer Trash
For them, the worst-case scenario is approval of a bill to cap carbon-dioxide emissions that was defeated in the Senate by eight votes last fall.

So, if this law passes and we are just under the cap, who gets to decide who is not allowed to breathe for the remainder of the Fiscal Year?

Actually, given that enviro-weenies espouse genocide on a routine basis, this is not a funny joke...

16 posted on 05/28/2004 7:47:06 AM PDT by bondjamesbond (Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson