Moore filmed Berg before he left for Iraq. Adds to one theory that Moore did not meet with Berg so much as recruit him to do some filming or take some pictures, for starters of the Abu Gharib prison.
Is the Berg was pro Bush, pro military stance being put forth simply a cover for (1) Berg's real purpose to going into a war zone (2) cover the tracks of others who may be, directly or indirectly, complicit in his murder?
Conspiracy laden snickers aside, reasonable people are being asked to accept that Berg, described as merely an adventurer, just happens to travel continents rife with active terrorism looking for work or to "help" the poor or to look for work in a war zone and who happens to loan his email account to Z Moussaui, happens to be filmed by the likes of Michael Moore, something his sister claims she didn't know about?
Sorry but credulity does not stretch that far.
Bingo.
Now we know that Moore interviewed Berg last year. Last year he was an unknown to us.
Now we have another dot out there in incredible to believe that it is a coincidence land.
Think about it: if a guy like Michael Moore interviewed you for 20 minutes, and you are this "adventure seeking" free spirit who thinks galavanting around Iraq & getting arrested makes life seem "like a mystery novel" - why wouldn't you at least EMAIL your family - "hey man! I got interviewed by that documentary guy you all love & I hate...."
He seemed quite detailed in his emails, and if he left the Michael Moore encounter out, there was a good reason.
What is Michael Moore already knew about those prison pictures when he talked to Berg. Didn't they happen in November, or am I wrong on that?