Think about it: if a guy like Michael Moore interviewed you for 20 minutes, and you are this "adventure seeking" free spirit who thinks galavanting around Iraq & getting arrested makes life seem "like a mystery novel" - why wouldn't you at least EMAIL your family - "hey man! I got interviewed by that documentary guy you all love & I hate...."
He seemed quite detailed in his emails, and if he left the Michael Moore encounter out, there was a good reason.
According to what the sister says, the family didn't know a thing about it.
"He seemed quite detailed in his emails, and if he left the Michael Moore encounter out, there was a good reason."
Excellent point.
More questions: Is the omission of Moore's interview by Berg in Berg's emails as telling as Moore's omission of Berg's interview by him in either public comment (until Salon revealed it) or his crock-of-benalities movie?