Posted on 05/27/2004 11:37:06 AM PDT by SunStar
pung
I bet they did. To each other, one romantic night...
bump
So, if that was the case, he of course would have no way of knowing what possibly could have occurred.
Hmmm...reminds me of some other story that I heard a while ago. I didn't believe that public official either.
Recently, I heard that that former public official us off his meds and is screaming incessantly about terrorist's civil rights. Next, he will be roaming the streets of a major city talking to buildings and using newspaper as a blanket.
Queen had a song you will recognize: Here is to all of us.
We are the champions - my friends
And we'll keep on fighting
Till the end
We are the champions
We are the champions
No time for losers
'Cause we are the champions of the World
I've taken my bows
And my curtain calls
You brought me fame and fortune
And everything that goes with it
I thank you all
But it's been no bed of roses
No pleasure cruise
I consider it a challenge before
The whole human race
And I ain't gonna lose
And we mean to go on and on and on and on
We are the champions - my friends
And we'll keep on fighting
Till the end
We are the champions
We are the champions
No time for losers
'Cause we are the champions of the World
We are the champions - my friends
And we'll keep on fighting
Till the end
We are the champions
We are the champions
No time for losers
'Cause we are the champions
So will the Democrats. It sounds so much better to say Saddam had "no connection", especially when one is trying hard to sabotage our policies in this war and get George Bush defeated.
At least Rush covered one of these stories on his show today. One can only hope that the Bush administration is simply getting all of their ducks in a row for the eventual dot-connection press conference. You know, the one where the media will ignore the point in favor of trying to get Bush to say he's sorry or some such rot.
Whats the chances of this being aired on the evening news?
I wonder if there could be more than one Ahmed Hikmat Shakir in Iraq. We need to find out.
Politics as usual.
Thanks for doing that.
wonderful. thanks for these key links between 9/11 and Saddam.
rest assured the media will of course want front-page coverage to make sure the people are well-informed of this fact.
I have to wonder, is avoiding lawsuits really worth having President Kerry? I don't think the Administration would risk it. Perhaps they are sandbagging their opponents, but by waiting this long, the Administration has made a huge mistake. In the middle of the political season, the news of this will NEVER get out to the electorate on a widespread basis.
Since the Cold War and before, we have had the ability to strike very quickly.
Chaney was for immediate response.
So how "stupid" is this?
I am not saying vote for Kerry. I want Bush to win. Just believe that a less moderate Republican would be better.
Hopefully by 08 we will have one.
You mean the same Air Force which had been bombing Saddam's forces for years without result? No thanks.
An EFFECTIVE response takes time to get in place and time to convince the population we must act. I doubt Cheney believed any different.
Only in your dreams would a more conservative president be electable. How can you seriously believe any politician more conservative than Bush could possibly get elected given that the electorate is moderate at best and dumb as a box of rocks at worst? This is not realistic.
RATmedia propaganda still works as the tied polls indicate. Now these may be lies but I don't think they are that far off. We cannot elect more conservative politicians unless we can totally destroy the influence of the RATmedia.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.