The WSJ article finishes with a criticism of the administration for not making a clear case to the public of the connection between Saddam and terrorism. Right next to that article is a large article, The Real Story of Fallujah, again ending with a criticism of the administration for not getting the truly important, positive stories out to the public and allowing the histrionics over the prison stories to obscure all the positive news.
I also quickly read through the WSJ and never made it to the editorial page. My question is why is this only reported on their editorial page? If the WSJ doesn't think this is important enough for page one, who will?
I think that's a valid criticism.
BC'04, are you reading this!!??
In all the talk about Rumsfeld needing to go - In my opinion Powell is really not doing much for us.
He needs to get his btt off the bench and be respopnsible for some positve quotes and positive energy, instead of constantly looking like he can't even negotiate with the French.
I love Powell - and think he can do it - but he needs to rise to the challenge.
Diva's Husband