That is not name calling that is pointing out that you work for the bad guys...the 'rats. You are their friend because you attack Republicans.
If winning means compromising all of the my previously stated values then, yes, I would.
Voting for Dubya is "compromising all of the my previously stated values." That is exactly what the 'rats think too.
It's okay for you to attack me because you think that I work for the rat team. But, if I call you a Bush-bot for supporting Bush, even though he's compromised many conservative values (Increased federal spending, encouraging illegal immigration, NOT standing up for his judicial appointees, etc.) Can I quote someone here? "Look up the word hypocrite."
That is not name calling that is pointing out that you work for the bad guys...the 'rats. You are their friend because you attack Republicans.
I didn't attack anyone. YOU attacked me. I was expressing my disappointment with Bush's administration.
Voting for Dubya is "compromising all of the my previously stated values."
Dubya is the one compromising his previously stated values. He's not, in any way, (except for a minor tax break) espousing conservative values. If you agree with his domestic policies then you are not a conservative, either.
If being a republican means supporting Bush and his policies, then I am probably not a republican any more. I am an independant conservative. Like I told someone else: I guess there really is no dissent allowed in the Bush administration.
I would not ever vote for any of the lunatic democrats. But, I am very disappointed with Bush. If that means, to you, that I am a 'rat. Then you are the closed-minded one who blindly follows and allows no dissent. I don't want to be like you. Good day, Sir.