It's okay for you to attack me because you think that I work for the rat team. But, if I call you a Bush-bot for supporting Bush, even though he's compromised many conservative values (Increased federal spending, encouraging illegal immigration, NOT standing up for his judicial appointees, etc.) Can I quote someone here? "Look up the word hypocrite."
That is not name calling that is pointing out that you work for the bad guys...the 'rats. You are their friend because you attack Republicans.
I didn't attack anyone. YOU attacked me. I was expressing my disappointment with Bush's administration.
Voting for Dubya is "compromising all of the my previously stated values."
Dubya is the one compromising his previously stated values. He's not, in any way, (except for a minor tax break) espousing conservative values. If you agree with his domestic policies then you are not a conservative, either.
If being a republican means supporting Bush and his policies, then I am probably not a republican any more. I am an independant conservative. Like I told someone else: I guess there really is no dissent allowed in the Bush administration.
I would not ever vote for any of the lunatic democrats. But, I am very disappointed with Bush. If that means, to you, that I am a 'rat. Then you are the closed-minded one who blindly follows and allows no dissent. I don't want to be like you. Good day, Sir.
If you can name one issue, excluding campaign finance reform (I can give good reasons for his change of heart for this issue,) where Dubya has compromised on his campaign promises I will admit you are right.
From education reform to medicare reform to tax-cuts Dubya has supported and often delivered on his promises. Perhaps you did not listen to Dubya's campaign promises.
Dubya has fought for his judicial nominee's, but you seem to think he can wave a magic wand and confirm them regardless of what the Constitution says. We are at war and just coming out of a recession. Dubya said he would support increased federal spending in times of war or recession during the 2000 campaign. I am unaware of any statement Dubya made about immigration during the 2000 presidential elections, but you KNOW he has compromised on this issue so please give me a quote or a web-link to prove your assertions.
If being a (R)epublican means supporting Bush and his policies, then I am probably not a (R)epublican any more.
From right to life, to tax-cuts, to defense Dubya is more conservative than Reagan. I believe you were never a Republican. I believe you are a malcontent agitator fighting for the 'rats. I believe you are so dumb you do not know which side you fight for.
I would not ever vote for any of the lunatic democrats.
Until this sentence I have not seen you write anything bad about the 'rats. You only have scorn for Republicans.
...you are the closed-minded...blindly follows...allows no dissent.
I have allowed you to assert your stupidity. I can't stop you from making a fool of yourself. This is still a free country unless people like you get their way. Yes I think you are wrong. Yes, I believe I have a right to prove you are wrong. What is the problem with that? I don't understand your complaint. If a mentally deficient Freeper posts slander why should I keep quite? You have the right to prove you are dumb. What have I posted that is contrary to this statement?
I don't want to be like you. Good day, Sir.
You are nothing like me. FOAD...Cur.