[datura]

Given Kerry's Senate record and his personal views, I'd say that having him as President would be the final undoing of the USA. He'd finish the job the 'toons started.

Basically, he'd leave conservatives no other option than armed revolution to save the Republic. Thank God we'd have the military on our side as well as keep any other nation from intervening.

The nation that would emerge from the ashes of that civil war would be far stronger than the one we live in today.

[nopardons]

If Kerry wins(GOD forbid!),there would be NO armed Civil War.The military would NOT fight "with" you.Whatever arose from the hallucinatory ashes of your pipe dream,would NOT be "stronger" than our nation is today. For ALL of the insane,juvenile talk about a bloody revolution,during the 8 long,weary,horrible years of the Clintons, NO ONE rose up,not a single soul,let alone an armed gang,to sweep them and their horde out of D.C.!

[Alberta's Child]

Given Kerry's Senate record and his personal views, I'd say that having him as President would be the final undoing of the USA.

I doubt it. One positive aspect of a Kerry victory in November, though, would be that Republicans would go back and start acting like they did in 1994.

[roses of sharon]

A Kerry/UN/Soros victory would mean the UN would be back in vogue.

Soros is campaigning for Kerry, and has said he wants to "burst the bubble of American supremacy".

Another Kerry supporter, Walter Cronkite made a speech to the UN saying, "we must strengthen the UN first, it is a step towards a world gov patterned by our own gov, to do that Americans will need to yield up some of our sovereignty".

The World Court, Kyoto, and god knows what else is in our future.

And do not think that Republicans will be strong under Kerry, the media drummed the 94 class out, and judging their performance during the last few months, I would say they are beholden to the NYT, and the NY elite media, more than they are to us.