Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Baffling Disease Makes Lobsters Look Ugly
AP to My Yahoo! ^ | Tue May 25, 2004 | JAY LINDSAY

Posted on 05/25/2004 7:04:59 PM PDT by Pharmboy

BOSTON - A baffling disease that makes lobsters ugly, but not inedible, has crept northward from the Buzzards Bay hotspot where it's afflicted lobsters for several years.

The numbers of infected lobsters are far too tiny to cause panic, but the disease's progress is being eyed warily by regional researchers and lobstermen. The disease doesn't affect the meat, but a lobster with a corroded, blackened shell is a tough sell.

"You go and spend $8 for a lobster, you want a good-looking lobster," said Edward Heaphy, a lobsterman of 50 years from Dover, N.H.

In 1998, diseased lobsters began filling traps in the Buzzards Bay area, off the coast of southeastern Massachusetts. Almost a quarter of all lobsters sampled by the state in the bay that year had the disease, known as shell burn.

In the years since, the diseased lobsters were found in lesser numbers in Cape Cod Bay and Boston Harbor. Last year, according to preliminary numbers, 3 percent of lobsters caught off Salem and Cape Ann had the disease — the first time since sampling began there in 2000 that any infected lobsters were recorded.

"We've seen, year by year, a slow, steady progression northward," said Bob Glenn, a biologist leading the coastal lobster studies at the state Division of Marine Fisheries.

Arthur Sawyer, a second generation Gloucester lobsterman, said he's spotted a couple diseased lobsters in the last year or two, but added, "You're still talking about nothing."

He said the disease is worth watching because of its mobility and unexplained cause.

"To say whether it's going to get worse or not, nobody knows," Sawyer said. "Those guys got creamed down there (in Buzzards Bay)."

The state's lobster catch was worth $56.7 million in 2002, the most recent year for which statistics were available.

The shell disease hasn't been tied to any mass die-offs, and lobsters seem to survive it reasonably well, though perhaps in a weakened state, Glenn said.

The disease is caused by the chitinolytic bacteria that eats chitin, a cellulose-like substance in the shells. The disease has been around forever, but the strain that's hit Buzzards Bay lobsters could be new and more virulent, Glenn said.

Other theories tie it to pollution, warmer coastal waters or some weakness in the lobsters. Glenn said that unless researchers find an easily contained cause of the disease — say a leaking chemical pipe — nature will likely have to fix the problem.

"It's not like livestock where you could inoculate them," he said.

The disease has yet to significantly affect Maine — where fishery officials recorded a minuscule 44 cases of shell disease among 130,000 lobsters sampled in 2003 — or New Hampshire, where the disease turned up in 43 of 14,308 lobsters.

"Right now, I don't think it's anything to be concerned about," Heaphy said. "We're keeping our fingers crossed."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; US: Maine; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: coastalenvironment; lobsters; shoredinner; ugly
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
To: Pharmboy

"ugly, but not inedible"

Alexandra Kerry in that black dress.


41 posted on 05/25/2004 7:41:15 PM PDT by Palladin (Proud to be a FReeper!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Palladin

BWAHAHAHA...On the money!


42 posted on 05/25/2004 7:44:56 PM PDT by Pharmboy (History's greatest agent for freedom: The US Armed Forces)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy

An ugly lobster..... WHAT A CONCEPT,,,,,,,,


43 posted on 05/25/2004 7:45:38 PM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy

The Cure: Very hot baths and a drawn butter baptism at Mike's spa.


44 posted on 05/25/2004 7:57:47 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (NEOCON NOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
They look pretty to me...

Well, that's because the ones in that there photo aren't Maine lobsters. They look more like the infinitely more handsome and well-proportioned spiny lobsters.

45 posted on 05/25/2004 8:05:10 PM PDT by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Palladin

The obligatory pic!

46 posted on 05/25/2004 8:05:30 PM PDT by dcwusmc ("The most dangerous man, to any government, is the man who is able to think things out for himself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: annyokie
Commercial fisherman call lobsters "bugs" so you aren't too far off.

Well, they're nearest land relative IS the cockroach, efter all.

47 posted on 05/25/2004 8:07:46 PM PDT by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: piasa

I'll remember that while I a sucking out their sweet leg flesh and swishing it in butter.

The lobsters, not the roaches. Roaches receive the heel of my shoe.


48 posted on 05/25/2004 8:13:15 PM PDT by annyokie (There are two sides to every argument, but I'm too busy to listen to yours.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: dcwusmc

hehehehehe


49 posted on 05/25/2004 8:15:55 PM PDT by cyborg (tit for tat butter for fat hillary is ugly that's a fact)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: annyokie

Just think of roaches as 'popcorn lobster.'


50 posted on 05/25/2004 8:18:58 PM PDT by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: piasa

Unfortunately, in a survival situation where roaches might be considered a possible entree, there isn't much butter to be had.


51 posted on 05/25/2004 8:20:32 PM PDT by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy

Eating lobsters is the equivalent of licking "honey-dippers."


52 posted on 05/25/2004 8:35:12 PM PDT by Old Professer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: annyokie

53 posted on 05/25/2004 8:37:14 PM PDT by NewRomeTacitus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Landru
"Other theories tie it to pollution, warmer coastal waters or some weakness in the lobsters."

I'm thinking go to a PF30 on the sun screen for the delicate little critters. Maybe Teddy is making noxious bubbles off Martha's Vineyard ;^)

FGS

54 posted on 05/25/2004 8:45:11 PM PDT by ForGod'sSake (ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: ForGod'sSake

57 posts and no-one said it's "Bushes fault"


55 posted on 05/25/2004 9:26:22 PM PDT by spokeshave (It is, as it was)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy

WHOA!! Nice Bugs!!!!!!


56 posted on 05/25/2004 9:30:29 PM PDT by JoeSixPack1 (Freedom Stands Because Heroes Serve.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: spokeshave

It's bushes fault.

http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/lobster.php


57 posted on 05/25/2004 9:53:31 PM PDT by John Will
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: BJungNan
DEMAND EMERGENCY CONTRACEPTION OVER THE COUNTER.

Makes one wish their mothers had had that option.

And what is Mad Maddy doing there? Gargoyles don't breed.

58 posted on 05/25/2004 11:15:41 PM PDT by reformed_democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy

Is this what Helen Thomas eats?


59 posted on 05/25/2004 11:21:34 PM PDT by weegee (NO BLOOD FOR RATINGS. CNN ignored torture & murder in Saddam's Iraq to keep their Baghdad Bureau.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ForGod'sSake
"I'm thinking go to a PF30 on the sun screen for the delicate little critters."

Now that's a great idea, FGS!!
So sensitive, conservatively compassionate even.
Be that as it may there's still one problem for the creatures, too.
I really don't think a PF30 sunscreen will protect 'em from a pot of boiling water. :^)

"Maybe Teddy is making noxious bubbles off Martha's Vineyard"

HA!!
Only if the sot's blathering underwater, I'd guess.

Or, he's mixing the wrong food(s) & his booze.

...again.

60 posted on 05/26/2004 6:37:23 AM PDT by Landru (Indulgences: 2 for a buck.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson