""I believe you compared it to being in a "prison". ""
I did. Where? Where did I compare border control to "prison." You have the word -prison- in quotations so I assume you think I made the connotation.
You and Joe are two peas in pod, he does the same thing, that is, you all set up remarks, meanings, inferences, quotations, etc...that were never made and then you go on to make you brilliant pointy-headed rebuttles.
Border control is a nice theory, filled with beautiful flowers and rainbows to make us all feel good about it's security potential. It will always remain a feel-good theory.
Oh, and btw, your math is somewhat derelict and I quote:
"Joe Hadenuf is 1000%"
A person can only be 100% right. Maybe you and Joe can get our borders 1000% protected though.
One of the posters compared having a border with being 'locked down' and imprisoned. if it wasn't you, then it was someone who sounded exactly like you and shared your ideology; I'm not going to wade through the 600 replies to find it. Regardless of whether it was you or another so-called "conservative" reconquista advocate who said it, my point (which you failed to address) still applies.
You either don't respect or comprehend the Constitution. Patrolling our border isn't a 'flowery pipe-dream' as you suggest . it's an integral part of sovereignty.
On a related note, since you seem to adore the party instead of conservative principle, I'd love to know if you support Bushs' endorsement of abortionist Specter instead of Pat Toomey. Also, if you support him appointing open sodomites and their lovers to head the American Embassy in Romania.
You'll probably say "what do those pesky issues have to do with principles or conservatism? That stuff doesnt matter."
All hail your hero-leader Bush. for shame.