I'm suggesting they've ordered Kerry NOT to accept the nomination until the polls show how he's doing in the Autumn.
The idea of someone NOT accepting a sure nomination at a convention for just that purpose SHOULD cause reflection on covert reasons for why one would do that.
We should not simply BUY INTO Kerry's explanation.
"I'm suggesting they've ordered Kerry NOT to accept the nomination until the polls show how he's doing in the Autumn.
The idea of someone NOT accepting a sure nomination at a convention for just that purpose SHOULD cause reflection on covert reasons for why one would do that.
We should not simply BUY INTO Kerry's explanation."
For your notion to be valid, we have to ignore a half dozen recent examples of Kerry being "politically inept". This is just the latest example of it, the floating of a ridiculous "trial balloon" thats hurting him credibility wise, again.
You actually believe on one hand the Clinton's are this political "divine force" for the left, while at the same time ignore the fact they've led the Democratic Party into clear Minority Status, and have given the Party a seriously flawed far leftwing candidate with a anti defense voting record that stretches back two decades, huh?
I simply don't agree with that concept. Every fact that can be cited demonstrates the exact opposite in my opinion.