Replies

I'll sum it up your position. There were children who died on 9/11. They were killed by terrorists. So far, so good, I totally agree with these prone facts.

Then your conclusion is : oh, then we should kill Iraqi children too. To prove what, Shut Up ? That you can sink to their level ? That it's really cool to kill children (as if Iraqi children had anything to do with 9/11) ?

Let's take this road for awhile, then. On 9/11, terrorist thugs targeted innocent civilians just to score a cheap "victory" by striking a soft target, with the aim of committing mass murder. What you say, is "hey, cool, let's do the same thing, and it sure will solve everything, what are we waiting for, and the dead children would probably be terrorist themselves anyway" ? Wow, I'm impressed. Thank you for your contribution to Western civilization, kiddo.

You certainly don't expect much of your country or soldiers. Why don't you apply to yourself your apt screen name and let the grown-ups in Washington work seriously ?

"Then your conclusion is : oh, then we should kill Iraqi children too. To prove what, Shut Up ?"

From your page: "All right, where to begin ? I'm a 34 year-old Frenchman - and yep, French as a frigging frog." That says it all. For the record Frenchie, it's hard to avoid killing the "innocent little children" when the terrorist are hiding amongst them to shoot at our troops! I'm just saying that the collateral damage is no great tragedy. These children are raised from birth to be terrorists. Check out post #63.

It's hard for me to believe that Frenchmen were once real men that explored, and colonized a large part of the Americas. You need to get back to your roots pal!