[TomGuy]

Top-notch Internet research can easily establish when a statement by a public official, reporter, or network is inaccurate.

Some don't want to see even when presented with the facts. Even some on FR are like that.

I know of instances where one poster challenges another. The original poster supplies a link. The challenger replies something like, "Well, that's from a liberal publication." So??? Even liberal publications are right on occasion.

Once I asked a poster to provide a link supporting a statement he made. He replied, 'This if FR, I don't have to provide a link to support my position." lol.

[TakeChargeBob]

Nevertheless, there can be legitimate proof that can be made. The challenge is to refute this proof. the sequence of how the proof was made would be on the web.

Bottom line facts are facts.

It is true, however, that some people can not believe facts that goes against their opinion regardless of how good the proof is. But a constant stream of quality findings will build credibility and will eventually take traction.