To: Brilliant
Loss of consortium: Deprivation in some degree of the companionship, affection,
sexual relations, or cooperation of a spouse due to an accident or injury.
Yes sir, you can still sue for not being able to get any from your significant other.
How this will work with homosexual "marriage" is frightening to contemplate, but I bet the courts will find a solution lickety-split.
7 posted on
05/22/2004 8:12:38 AM PDT by
Loyalist
(Kasper for Pope: Because things won't get better until they can't get any worse!)
To: Loyalist
I bet the courts will find a solution lickety-split. "Lickety split" is a lesbian divorce, right?
To: Loyalist
It seems to me that as it was Massachusetts that allowed for this silliness, that the State of Massachusetts should be the ones to foot the bill!!
THAT might encourage the voters to clean house in that State.
14 posted on
05/22/2004 8:35:07 AM PDT by
Gator113
To: Loyalist; Brilliant
<< ..... I bet the courts will find a solution lickety-split. >>
Gross.
[But the addressee says it all ....
.... and I love it]
56 posted on
05/23/2004 3:14:21 AM PDT by
Brian Allen
(Intact - Male - American - Republican - Pro-Bush - PRO-ISRAEL - Pro-War - Pro-Gun - Pro-Life! Next?)
To: Loyalist
How this will work with homosexual "marriage" is frightening to contemplate, but I bet the courts will find a solution lickety-split.You are my hero.
63 posted on
05/23/2004 11:16:07 AM PDT by
lavrenti
(I'm not bad, just misunderstood.)
To: Loyalist
How this will work with homosexual "marriage" is frightening to contemplate, but I bet the courts will find a solution lickety-split.I beg your pardon???
64 posted on
05/23/2004 2:42:31 PM PDT by
Tolerance Sucks Rocks
(Meatwad make the money see; Meatwad get the honeys, G.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson