Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Newly Married Lesbian Couple Files Suit
AP ^ | May 22, 2004 | AP

Posted on 05/22/2004 8:06:03 AM PDT by Brilliant

BOSTON - One day after getting married, a lesbian couple filed a medical malpractice lawsuit asking that one of the women receive damages because doctors failed to detect breast cancer in her spouse.

The lawsuit filed Friday claims "loss of consortium" for Michelle Charron, 44, because of the advanced breast cancer in new wife Cindy Kalish, 39.

Loss of consortium is a legal claim long available to spouses, but only newly available to gay and lesbian couples since the state began allowing same-sex marriage Monday. The lawsuit provides a glimpse into the kinds of legal battles involving gay and lesbian unions that Massachusetts courts can now expect.

"I think there will be tons and tons of incidental issues, and this apparently is the first one," said Boston lawyer Steven Schreckinger.

Charron and Kalish were seventh in line on Monday to apply for a wedding license, and were married Thursday. The lawsuit contends that two doctors affiliated with Fallon Clinic failed to order a biopsy for a lump in Charron's breast, which she first brought to their attention in December 2002.

By the time the biopsy was performed nearly eight months later, Charron's lump had grown and she was diagnosed with advanced cancer that had spread to her liver and sternum. Doctors have given her 10 years to live.

A spokeswoman for Fallon Clinic declined to comment on the case.

The Supreme Judicial Court has ruled that unmarried partners cannot bring lack of consortium claims, said David White-Lief, a specialist in personal injury law and a former chairman of the Massachusetts Bar Association's civil litigation section.

Schreckinger said the lawsuit's timing could be challenged, because the alleged negligence was before the couple was married. But the couple's lawyer, Ann Maguire, said the court will view the case differently because marriage was not an option before Monday. The couple had a commitment ceremony in 1992.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: activistcourts; ambulancechasing; gay; homosexualagenda; judicialtyranny; lawsuit; lawsuitabuse; loserpays; malpractice; marriage; massachusetts; prisoners; samesexmarriage; sodomites; tortreform
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 last
To: L.N. Smithee

Massachusetts is very dependant on tourism. Why don't I hear any talk of boycotts by conservatives? That would get Mitt Romney into overdrive.


61 posted on 05/23/2004 11:09:49 AM PDT by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Samwise
Nothing that happens with judges and lawyers surprises me anymore.

No one's life liberty or property are safe as long as court is in session...

62 posted on 05/23/2004 11:11:49 AM PDT by null and void (The owls are not what they seem...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Loyalist
How this will work with homosexual "marriage" is frightening to contemplate, but I bet the courts will find a solution lickety-split.

You are my hero.

63 posted on 05/23/2004 11:16:07 AM PDT by lavrenti (I'm not bad, just misunderstood.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Loyalist
How this will work with homosexual "marriage" is frightening to contemplate, but I bet the courts will find a solution lickety-split.

I beg your pardon???

64 posted on 05/23/2004 2:42:31 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Meatwad make the money see; Meatwad get the honeys, G.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
Dear Massachusetts Supreme Court,

After undergoing a trans-gender operation in Boston I married my brother. In order to do that I had to divorce my mother whom I had married after Dad became a lesbian transsexual and she divorced him.

Currently I'm cheating on my brother with my twin sisters who became men several years ago just for the hell of it. Recently I filed a "Loss of Mentality" suit against my psychiatrist for turning my mind into a gelatinous goo.

My question is, "Should I wear the see-through-blouse to the Democrat convention so I can compete with Kerry's daughter, or should I just go topless??

65 posted on 05/24/2004 6:15:18 AM PDT by Doc Savage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RedBloodedAmerican
The whole point is to advance the agenda. Get the courts, the medical profession, the insurance industry, etc. to acknowledge the "legitimacy" of same sex marriage.

The homosexual agenda is being pushed through the courts at breakneck speed.

It was only a year ago that we were told that we were exaggerating what was in the chute.

66 posted on 05/24/2004 8:50:07 AM PDT by weegee (NO BLOOD FOR RATINGS. CNN ignored torture & murder in Saddam's Iraq to keep their Baghdad Bureau.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

What really matters here is that a fellow human being is going to lose her loved one to a horrible disease that is truly indiscriminate (ask Richard Roundtree).


67 posted on 05/24/2004 2:51:58 PM PDT by RightWingAtheist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson