Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Consequences of Pulling Out of Iraq
Fox News Channel ^ | May 20, 2004 | Brit Hume

Posted on 05/22/2004 5:41:44 AM PDT by arjay

BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

SEN. JOHN KERRY (D-MA), PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE: It will not be like Vietnam (search), and I will get our troops home from Iraq with honor. We're not going to be engaged in an active kind of death zone the way we are today.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

BRIT HUME, HOST: John Kerry (search) is not the only one talking about getting out of Iraq. The op-ed pages and the political talk shows this week in Washington are full of talk of defeat and failure in Iraq. What would that mean?

For answers we turn to Fox News contributor Mark Ginsberg, an adviser to several presidents on the Middle East who has recently been in Iraq.

Mark, welcome. Nice to see you.

MARC GINSBERG, FOX NEWS FOREIGN AFFAIRS ANALYST: Brit.

HUME: Let's assume that this mission falters. Let's assume that the U.S. is unable to put in please an interim government that can -- that can put on elections. What then in your judgment?

GINSBERG: Brit, we either inadvertently or intentionally -- some people have lost sight of the fact that we, since 9/11, we're in a war against Islamic radicalism. Iraq is part of that. And there's a consequence to essentially saying that somehow we can separate Iraq out, and not realize the ramifications around the regions to our interests, as well as global interests in the event we try to pretend that by pulling out of Iraq, there's no direct consequence to our long-term national security as a result of that.

HUME: Well, let's talk little bit about what would happen, in your view, in Iraq if the U.S. simply either pulled out or was not able to establish an authority that would hold.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: ginsberg; iraq
This is an excellent interview in which Ginsberg clearly states some of the consequences in the Middle East if we should pull out.

I strongly encourage you to check out the article on the web page.

He indicates some of the following consequences:

1. The Kurds would form a separate autonomous zone

2. The Sunni area would become a terrorist haven

3. Our word to the rest of the Middle East would mean nothing.

4. Zarqawi would be exalted

He makes other points and amplifies on the above as well.

Too bad we have to excerpt, but it is well worth a read.

1 posted on 05/22/2004 5:41:44 AM PDT by arjay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: arjay

IMHO Brit's show is one of the finest on the air.


2 posted on 05/22/2004 5:45:10 AM PDT by martin_fierro (Real men double post.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arjay

Bump to read later...Thank you!


3 posted on 05/22/2004 5:46:00 AM PDT by MEG33 (John Kerry's been AWOL for two decades on issues of National Security!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

Yes, it is. I also really enjoy John Gibson, and Neal Cavuto.


4 posted on 05/22/2004 5:50:11 AM PDT by Judith Anne (HOW ARE WE EVER GOING TO CLEAN UP ALL THIS MESS?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: arjay
3. Our word to the rest of the Middle East would mean nothing.

Yep, once again we would have utterly failed those we promised to help. The anti-American elements would be that much more emboldened to lash out against us and, worse still, become uncooperative in our efforts to discover and root out the real terrorists among them (especially in #2, The Sunni area).

But if that's what JF'nKerry's visio is for America, I say let him make the mistake of making that case. President Bush and his team have an uncany way of letting these dopes/dupes hang themselves with their own ropes and then come in and tighten the noose for them.

5 posted on 05/22/2004 5:55:04 AM PDT by craig_eddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arjay

I watched this particular piece when it aired. So glad they posted the transcript, because I found myself wishing I could share it with some folks who don't have satellite/cable. It made clear that Kerry would create a world-scale disaster.


6 posted on 05/22/2004 5:58:26 AM PDT by MizSterious (First, the journalists, THEN the lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious

You have Freepmail.


7 posted on 05/22/2004 5:59:11 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: arjay
SEN. JOHN KERRY (D-MA), PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE: It will not be like Vietnam (search), and I will get our troops home from Iraq with honor. We're not going to be engaged in an active kind of death zone the way we are today.

John Kerry can say less with more words than most politicians. Kerry speaks allot of words; they just don't have any substance or much meaning, when they are examined.

It will not be like Vietnam. Ok, so he contradicts Kennedy. Iraq is Iraq; it isn't Vietnam. That isn't an earth-shattering revelation.

I will get our troops home from Iraq with honor. Ok, how? The troops being rotated out and coming home with honor now. So what is so revolutionary about the John Kerry approach?

We're not going to be engaged in an active kind of death zone the way we are today. 'an active kind of death zone'? What is that? What is that statement supposed to mean?
8 posted on 05/22/2004 6:01:38 AM PDT by TomGuy (Clintonites have such good hind-sight because they had their heads up their hind-ends 8 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: craig_eddy
"Yep, once again we would have utterly failed those we promised to help."

In some ways, our very election system is a weakness in these matters, especially when the two parties are so radically divided on the major issues. Other nations know that once every four years, foreign policy could make a major shift. If Kerry were elected (Heaven forbid), for instance, it could be nearly a 180. (Or in his case, maybe a 360?) I can understand why they might think us somewhat unreliable, although in my opinion, not nearly as unreliable as many nations.

9 posted on 05/22/2004 6:05:33 AM PDT by MizSterious (First, the journalists, THEN the lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #10 Removed by Moderator

To: arjay
A shame Brit didn't have on a person with the opposite opinion of Mr. Ginsberg, trying to explain all the GOOD things that would happen if we turned tail and ran.

That would have been interesting.

11 posted on 05/22/2004 7:24:07 AM PDT by upchuck (With all due respect to my sister and her biting moose, cheese is milk's leap toward immortality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

Maybe that is because there are no good things if we cut and run.


12 posted on 05/22/2004 8:27:58 AM PDT by arjay ("I don't do bumper stickers." Donald Rumsfeld)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson