Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Banks say dress code leads to decline in robberies
Jefferson City News Tribune ^ | 5/20/04 | AP

Posted on 05/21/2004 6:31:45 PM PDT by wagglebee

Robberies at banks and credit unions in Missouri have dropped 36 percent in the past year, and some people attribute the decline to a new dress code.

Last year, more than 200 Missouri financial institutions adopted a "No hats, no hoods, no sunglasses" policy that had previously been used only in the Springfield area. Crime statistics released by the FBI indicate 42 fewer robberies in the first year that the policy has been in effect statewide.

From May 20, 2002, to May 1, 2003, there were 117 robberies at Missouri financial institutions. From the time the policy became effective statewide on May 20, 2003, through May 1, 2004, there were 75 such robberies.

"By removing hats, hoods, caps and sunglasses, consumers make it easier for staff and law enforcement to identify any suspected robbers, who often use these items as a disguise," Rosie Holub, president of the Missouri Credit Union Association, said in a statement Wednesday.

"We are able to obtain clearer security photos, and this policy draws attention to people who do not comply," Holub said. "The last thing a criminal wants is more attention, so they are more likely to leave without committing a robbery."

There's no proof that the policy is causing the decline in bank robberies, but FBI spokesman Jeff Lanza said the bureau was pleased about it.

"The potential for deterring bank and credit union robberies is evident with this program," Lanza said.

At least 162 banks and 70 credit unions participate in the program, but each institution determines how to enforce the policy.

Some institutions have an employee at the door who greets customers and asks them to remove any articles that obscure their faces, while others just post signs that ask patrons to remove those items voluntarily. Customers are to be served even if they refuse to remove their headgear, but cashiers, security officers and all employees are supposed to be more watchful.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events; US: Missouri
KEYWORDS: bankrobberies; dresscodes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
Last year, more than 200 Missouri financial institutions adopted a "No hats, no hoods, no sunglasses" policy that had previously been used only in the Springfield area. Crime statistics released by the FBI indicate 42 fewer robberies in the first year that the policy has been in effect statewide.

I'm sure the left will find some way to say this is discrimination.

1 posted on 05/21/2004 6:31:46 PM PDT by wagglebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Duh!


2 posted on 05/21/2004 6:32:55 PM PDT by gilliam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
I find it likely that there are people who are insulted at being told to remove their hats and sunglasses as they come in the door.

But then I remember once watching a clerk at a gun store, barking "Take Your Hands Out Of Your Pockets!" at a young guy who'd come slouching into the store.

He let go of whatever it was that he'd been holding on to, held his hands out to his side, then turned around and left. Rather quickly, as I remember.

I'm sure he, also, felt insulted.

3 posted on 05/21/2004 6:36:00 PM PDT by jdege
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

"No sunglasses" discriminate against the blind.


4 posted on 05/21/2004 6:36:40 PM PDT by sd-joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

I love the idea, let's you be aware of one who isn't complying and to step away from them...just in case.


5 posted on 05/21/2004 6:37:10 PM PDT by Kackikat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sd-joe

I would think a cane or a "dog" would indicate one was blind and it says it isn't mandatory. However a robber could come dressed as a blind person too.


6 posted on 05/21/2004 6:38:38 PM PDT by Kackikat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Discrimination. No burkhas????


7 posted on 05/21/2004 6:39:04 PM PDT by jackbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
I'm sure the left will find some way to say this is discrimination.



8 posted on 05/21/2004 6:40:25 PM PDT by bwteim ("Begin With The End In Mind")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

People go into banks?

I think the last time I actually walked into a bank was sometime in the 80s.


9 posted on 05/21/2004 6:40:44 PM PDT by Straight Vermonter (06/07/04 - 1000 days since 09/11/01)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Straight Vermonter

more amazing....9 posts, and not one mention of "profiling"


10 posted on 05/21/2004 6:42:21 PM PDT by ken5050 (Ann Coulter needs to have children ASAP to propagate her genes.....any volunteers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Common sense bump!


11 posted on 05/21/2004 6:42:34 PM PDT by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

"apt natural. I have a gub"


12 posted on 05/21/2004 6:45:21 PM PDT by KneelBeforeZod (Deus Lo Volt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Why not metal detectors?


13 posted on 05/21/2004 6:46:38 PM PDT by Scenic Sounds (Sí, estamos libres sonreír otra vez - ahora y siempre.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

FBI said no indication that this is the reason for the decline, probably because it wasn't their idea, government morons.


14 posted on 05/21/2004 6:48:22 PM PDT by boomop1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

15 posted on 05/21/2004 6:50:27 PM PDT by Khurkris (Ranger On...revenge, grudge, payback...call it what you will. The knives are comin' out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scenic Sounds

People hauling in change would set it off all the time


16 posted on 05/21/2004 6:50:32 PM PDT by Crazieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Crazieman
People hauling in change would set it off all the time

Yeah, but they could have you put all the coins in those little trays like at the airport.

And take off your shoes, too. ;-)

17 posted on 05/21/2004 6:52:45 PM PDT by Scenic Sounds (Sí, estamos libres sonreír otra vez - ahora y siempre.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

No shoes
No shirt
No stickup


18 posted on 05/21/2004 6:55:05 PM PDT by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Jeez, and I thought this would be a story about a new trend in "naked" banks. You know, no concealed forearms, etc.

Although I guess "Stick up" might carry a new connotation.


19 posted on 05/21/2004 6:57:03 PM PDT by XEHRpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scenic Sounds

I went to an amusement park recently. They had metal detectors to get in. They wanted to take my pocket knife. I turned around and left.


20 posted on 05/21/2004 6:57:46 PM PDT by gitmo (Thanks, Mel. I needed that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson