[Physicist]

Oh, I get it. If I claim to know something about evolution, I'm out of line, as I'm not in the field, whereas you're entitled to represent the professional opinions of everyone in the field ("nobody would dare"). Got it.

[Truth666]

"If I claim to know something about evolution, I'm out of line, as I'm not in the field, " - this technique is also true, but let me give an example to clarify what technique I mean :
- suppose you are in the field as a recognised "evolution scientist" (i.e. so far you have been not questioning the foundations of official evolution theory). - now suppose that for some reason you change your view and start advocating that significant evolution has taken place not so long ago, say during the last 10,000 years.
The question is : why would you immediately loose your status as a recognised "evolution scientist" ?

[Truth666]

Hint about the technique : implementing the foundation of the big lie "evolution" relies on three cheap tricks that belongs technically in that category.
Two of those tricks them have been mainly used with human evolution / out of Africa.

One of these is actually the most sucessful trick ever from this category, and has been identified in a previous thread : cheap trick behind the most devasting lie in the history of mankind
(see there #50 by wirestripper for the first freeper to get the right path; see #54 by martian_22 for the precise correct answer.)

The trick I mean concerning what we discuss now, is the third one from that category; it is decisive for people to believe in all aspects of evolution, not only in human evolution.