Posted on 05/21/2004 10:02:09 AM PDT by dennisw
HMMM..ok I see now ..a commie/democRAT..figures
Like that narrows down much of anything.
Hang him and move on.
We don't need any foreign traitors in our military, we have enough domestic one's to worry about.
Why does a jerk like this even join the military?
Like that narrows down much of anything.
Yep, that could include the Democrat party. I'll try to be more accurate in the future.
Wll the courts martial last a full hour?
Now that a Sandinista has declared against the "Zionist" war, will the Messiahphobes adopt them alongside Gore Vidal and Norman Mailer?
Speaking on Mejia's behalf, his lawyer Louis Font, said that once his trial date was sent - expected to be in two weeks - he thought the case would move rapidly forward, resulting in the complete exoneration of his client.
"I'm certain we'll be able to demonstrate to the court that Camilo is no criminal," he asserted. "We are tranquil and optimistic." Part of Font's serenity is based on the powerful array of defense witnesses he has marshaled. It includes UN weapons inspector Hans Blix, and former U.S. national security advisor Richard Clark. Font himself was a conscientious objector during the US war on Vietnam, and is a leading expert on military codes.
"We are going to win this," said Font. "Camilo is a conscientious objector. We're going to show that his arguments are completely valid; that in fact he was sent to a war based on lies and deception. We are counting on the testimony of these very powerful witnesses. Mr. Blix headed up an inspection commission to Iraq, while Mr. Clark testified before the September 11, 2001 Commission. And they're only our most important witnesses of a very long list which includes professors and specialists in international law who will show that the war on Iraq was never legal. As documentary evidence," he continued, "we will introduce everything that has been written about Camilo and his arguments, both in Nicaragua and here in the USA."
I don't think so, LOSER!
This case was cut and dried, and had no grounds for anything other than guilty.
One feels a slight empathy with the Sgt. but the real guilty ones are his lawyer and councilors,
it is too bad THEY do not have to pay a price for THEIR
actions.
He is a simple COWARD
He's obviously no "conscientious objector" who objects to war on general principles. He only says now that he objects to this particular war for purely political reasons. I don't know anything about military law, but I don't think this cuts it.
more important question is:
How does a commie like this join the Army?
Watch the syrupy respect and deference CBS will give this guy. Is he going to publish a book with Viacom?
Exxxzzzactly.
In my former youthful and foolish left-wing days, I explored this route and believe me, the Army DOES allow for filing objector status. But you have to FILE, then have a hearing. You can't just up and refuse duty.
sounds more like conspiracy than simple desertion.
Not to mention that I'm stunned to learn this creep is second generation sandanista - why did OUR side ever hand him a rifle?
I would suspect that joining the US military and then proceeding to undermine the mission is an old tactic used by the Communists and being used even more effectively now that the media has jumped on the leftist bandwagon.
I would suspect that joining the US military and then proceeding to undermine the mission is an old tactic used by the Communists and being used even more effectively now that the media has jumped on the leftist bandwagon.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.