Did Time make this layout deliberately to give Bush two red horns on top of his head...Bush the red devil?
1 posted on
05/20/2004 11:32:44 PM PDT by
Rokurota
To: Rokurota
2 posted on
05/20/2004 11:37:31 PM PDT by
BigSkyFreeper
(John Kerry: An old creep, with gray hair, trying to look like he's 30 years old.)
To: Rokurota
I think you're over the top on this one.
3 posted on
05/20/2004 11:45:41 PM PDT by
zarf
(..where lieth those little things with the sort of raffia work base that has an attachment?)
To: Rokurota
Well TIME wasn't about to use THIS one since it doesn't fit their agenda.
5 posted on
05/21/2004 12:06:17 AM PDT by
arasina
(So there.)
To: Rokurota
It wouldn't surprise me if they did choose this particular photo because it might look like he has horns. After all, all the images behind his head reflect only the worst of moments in Iraq.
It just would be horrible to remind people of how many people in Iraq are happy, how the Iraqi's danced with joy at Saddam's statues being toppled.
I always get a giggle when the media tries to declare themselves 'neutral.' Yeah, right.
6 posted on
05/21/2004 12:25:31 AM PDT by
kingu
(Which would you bet on? Iraq and Afghanistan? Or Haiti and Kosovo?)
To: Rokurota
Note the guy on the right in the military uniform, appearing to give a nazi salute. The whole cover is a visual smear of Bush.
7 posted on
05/21/2004 12:27:30 AM PDT by
Bonaparte
To: Rokurota; bellevuesbest
Cross-linking RELATED threads:
11 posted on
05/21/2004 12:39:16 AM PDT by
RonDog
To: Rokurota
Is John Kerry Lurch ?
To: Rokurota
That's a stretch ....unless the thought of that idea decades ago when they decided to call their magazine 'Time.'
24 posted on
05/21/2004 2:07:47 AM PDT by
spetznaz
(Nuclear missiles: The ultimate Phallic symbol.)
To: Rokurota; BigSkyFreeper; zarf; TheConservator; arasina; kingu; Bonaparte; RonDog; ...
And another reason why I think it was just a coincidence. Have a look at the following Time cover that has Bill Clinton on it. He also has your 'horns,' hence did they do that to Clinton too on purpose? Also, Clinton's 'horns' are black while GW's are red ....does that have any significance?
Simple answer: no. The editors just happened to place the name of their magazine behind the visage of the respective presidents, and thus it appeared that there were horns. (Unless you want to say that Time has a penchant for putting horns on US presidents).
As for the comment that Taguba seems to have a 'Nazi salute' .....oh, come on! He is giving an OATH for goodness sake when he was testifying about the Abu Ghraib what-not. That is not a Nazi salute.
Seriously speaking, it is one thing to be perceptive. It is another to see witches and warlocks behind every door. That should be a trait left to liberals ....it discredits conservatives.
25 posted on
05/21/2004 2:20:21 AM PDT by
spetznaz
(Nuclear missiles: The ultimate Phallic symbol.)
To: Rokurota
Inquiring Minds Want To Know!
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson