Skip to comments.
Check out Bush On Cover of Time
Time Magazine
| 5-24-04
| Time Magazine
Posted on 05/20/2004 5:21:49 PM PDT by bellevuesbest
TOPICS: Front Page News; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: bush43; cic; timemag
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-97 next last
Gee, I wonder if there's something implied there with the M behind his head.
To: bellevuesbest
I didn't see that until I read your post. Hmmm...
My first thought was that it was a pretty good picture of him. He looks serious, and resolved.
2
posted on
05/20/2004 5:25:05 PM PDT
by
Ramius
(There may come a time when the strength of men fails, but it is NOT THIS DAY!)
To: bellevuesbest
good catch...no doubt...every single element of the mosaic has anything but a random choice...
Sickening...
3
posted on
05/20/2004 5:26:01 PM PDT
by
antaresequity
(This is not the "War on Terror", Islam is the common denominator)
To: Ramius
There is a reason Bush went to Capitol Hill today, and I think it is because there is BIG news about to hit very very soon. Heads up . . . the media is going to be in a deep depression come June or July.
4
posted on
05/20/2004 5:26:42 PM PDT
by
Galtoid
To: bellevuesbest
look at the photo of the Soldier mid lower right side...at first glance it looks like he is flipping the bird...
Taguba's upraised palm...
there is more
I will find it
5
posted on
05/20/2004 5:27:16 PM PDT
by
antaresequity
(This is not the "War on Terror", Islam is the common denominator)
To: bellevuesbest
To: bellevuesbest
looks like they got the relative importance of
the prisoner abuse with respect to Nick Berg correct, at
least according to the lamestream: 2 pics of prisoner abuse to one pic of Nick Berg, with the abuse on top of Nick.
7
posted on
05/20/2004 5:29:34 PM PDT
by
C210N
To: antaresequity
They made a big issue of the DemocRAT commercial, can we make some noise with this implication? We can point out that they are siding with the Islamist and their views of the Great Satan
To: antaresequity
While I appreciate the fact that not everything is roses over there, ALL of their pictures in the mosaic are of negatives. They could easily have shown the collision of positive developments and the attacks and Abu Ghraib.
9
posted on
05/20/2004 5:30:13 PM PDT
by
Skywalk
(Transdimensional Islam!!)
To: Galtoid
. . the media is going to be in a deep depression come June or July. Ohh I dunno about that... I bet Edie, Steve, and Brian will be their usual chipper selves.
To: bellevuesbest
11
posted on
05/20/2004 5:33:49 PM PDT
by
Finalapproach29er
(" Permitting homosexuality didn't work out very well for the Roman Empire")
To: bellevuesbest
TIME has reached tabloid status and I wouldn't read it even if I was waiting in the dentist's office.
To: bellevuesbest
They're trying to make re-election on Iraq instead of the economy. Bush can't let them do that.
13
posted on
05/20/2004 5:35:02 PM PDT
by
Finalapproach29er
(" Permitting homosexuality didn't work out very well for the Roman Empire")
To: Ramius
And the answer is . . . YES.
14
posted on
05/20/2004 5:37:10 PM PDT
by
LS
(CNN is the Amtrak of news.)
To: Ramius
My first thought was that it was a pretty good picture of him. He looks serious, and resolved.
Unlike that gastric pain on stork legs.
15
posted on
05/20/2004 5:37:25 PM PDT
by
aruanan
To: antaresequity
"I will find it"Who's that pathetic little pissant peekin around the LEFT side of the "M"??? (snort!)
16
posted on
05/20/2004 5:38:36 PM PDT
by
SierraWasp
(STOP PREMPTIVE JOURNALISM!!! A malevolent media can kill America's will, AGAIN!!!)
To: Finalapproach29er
Yah, he can, and should. As Dickie Morris says, the economy IS Iraq, because of the tensions and concerns there are hovering like a cloud over the economy.
If Bush is successful in getting a large measure of power into the hands of the Iraqi governing council, the WOT will be viewed as a gigantic victory. (It already is, but I'm just talking voter perception.)
17
posted on
05/20/2004 5:39:44 PM PDT
by
LS
(CNN is the Amtrak of news.)
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
"TIME has reached tabloid status and I wouldn't read it even if I was waiting in the dentist's office."
Yeah, but at least tabloids can be funny and aren't filled with terrorist propaganda.
18
posted on
05/20/2004 5:40:14 PM PDT
by
zencat
(Get some: http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2478851453)
To: SierraWasp
Look how they took Lydie England and led her leash into Bush's ear...
The whole thing is a wailing metaphor of the pathetic collective known as Time Magazine...
19
posted on
05/20/2004 5:41:35 PM PDT
by
antaresequity
(This is not the "War on Terror", Islam is the common denominator)
To: bellevuesbest; Grampa Dave; BOBTHENAILER
Not only that... The premise of the statement on the lower LEFT is absurdus maximus in view of the fact it took 7 years to turn things back over to the Germans and Japanese and out troops are STILL THERE TODAY!!!
WHAT UNMITIGATED PRIGS!!!
20
posted on
05/20/2004 5:42:35 PM PDT
by
SierraWasp
(STOP PREMPTIVE JOURNALISM!!! A malevolent media can kill America's will, AGAIN!!!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-97 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
