Replies

I actually agree with the demolition of Abu Ghraib. Its a highly smbolic gesture that erases a building that represents to much evil.

6 posted on 05/20/2004 7:02:15 PM PDT by aft_lizard (This space reserved for Sean Hannity to usurp:-))

I agree, but so long as the act occurs on July 1st - it can be the first sumbolic act of iraqi soverignty. that would be a good political and symbolic play all around.

17 posted on 05/20/2004 7:12:41 PM PDT by oceanview

I actually agree with the demolition of Abu Ghraib. Its a highly smbolic gesture that erases a building that represents to much evil.

Are you and the U.S. Congress out of your everlovin' minds?

Abu Ghraib is a massive crime scene. It constitutes evidence of the horrific crimes committed upon the Iraqi populace by Sadam and his Baathist thugs. If we ever bring them to trial, we are going to need Abu Ghraib!

Or...are you one of those sheeple who thinks the FBI behaved properly in bulldozing the Branch Davidian (Waco) compound before the ashes were cold?

Sumbolism over substance -- how very liberal...

60 posted on 05/20/2004 7:59:32 PM PDT by TXnMA (New Iraq ROE: "Any civilian male with his face covered is a legitimate target". $1,000 reward..)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794