Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senator spoke for many on Hill when he blamed Israel for war
WORLD TRIBUNE.COM ^ | Thursday, May 20, 2004 | Not Provided

Posted on 05/20/2004 10:33:16 AM PDT by .cnI redruM

A U.S. senator's charge that Israel is behind the Bush administrations's decision to invade Iraq has rattled American Jewish leaders.

Sen. Ernest Hollings, a South Carolina Democrat, wrote a column that appeared in several newspapers. The column asserted that the U.S. war against Iraq represented a decision by President George Bush to protect Israel and ensure American Jewish support for his reelection.

The column reflects a growing sentiment in the corridors of power in Washington according to congressional sources.

The view attributes the U.S. war in Iraq to the so-called neo-conservatives in the administration, particularly Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz and former Pentagon adviser Richard Perle, Middle East Newsline reported. Both men are Jewish. "Bush felt tax cuts would hold his crowd together and spreading democracy in the Mideast to secure Israel would take the Jewish vote from the Democrats," Hollings said in a column first published on May 6 in the Charleston Post and Courier. "You don't come to town and announce your Israel policy is to invade Iraq."

Congressional sources said Hollings was expressing a view that has become increasingly prevalent in Congress and parts of the administration.

"There is a strong fear among American Jewish leadership that the whispering campaign that 'the Jews started it,' will become public," a senior congressional staffer said. "We could be seeing others get on Hollings' bandwagon."

The column was reprinted on Hollings's website.

The administration has been debating a U.S. exit strategy from Iraq that appears to pit elements of the Defense Department against the State Department. The debate includes the affect of a short-term U.S. military withdrawal from Iraq on Washington's allies in the Middle East, particularly in the Gulf Cooperation Council. Such a U.S. withdrawal, Pentagon officials warned, could threaten these Gulf Arab states.

"They [Arab leaders] are more worried that we will lose our patience with the difficult tasks of stabilizing those places and will walk away and come home and bring up the drawbridges and defend Fortress America," U.S. Central Command chief Gen. John Abizaid told the Senate Armed Services Committee on Wednesday." "I reassured our friends that we are tough, that we cannot be defeated militarily, and that we will stay the course."

For his part, Hollings said Israel has never claimed that Iraq maintained a weapons of mass destruction arsenal. The senator, who later refused to retract his statements, said Wolfowitz's advocacy of a plan to promote democracy among Arab states comprised an Israeli initiative.

"With Iraq no threat, why invade a sovereign country?" Hollings asked. "The answer: President Bush's policy to secure Israel. Led by Wolfowitz, Richard Perle and Charles Krauthammer, for years there has been a domino school of thought that the way to guarantee Israel's security is to spread democracy in the area."

Hollings said Bush realized that he would be unable to bring about an Arab-Israeli peace to help his reelection efforts. Instead, Bush started laying the groundwork to invade Iraq days after his inauguration in 2001.

The senator said Wolfowitz persuaded Bush that the war against Iraq would take a week. Hollings said Vice President Richard Cheney was convinced U.S. troops would be greeted as liberators.

"In the Mideast, terrorism is a separate problem to be defeated by diplomacy and negotiation, not militarily," Hollings said. "Here, might does not make right – right makes might. Acting militarily, we have created more terrorism than we have eliminated."


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: South Carolina; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: antisemitism; foghorn; leghorn; mckinneyhislovechild
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last
When in doubt, take a cue from Cynthia McNutjob. Blame it all on Da Joos!
1 posted on 05/20/2004 10:33:17 AM PDT by .cnI redruM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
"In the Mideast, terrorism is a separate problem to be defeated by diplomacy and negotiation, not militarily,"

Wasn't it the greatest president of the 20th century Ronald Reagan who said we don't negotiate with terrorists.

2 posted on 05/20/2004 10:37:22 AM PDT by NeoCaveman (Krauthammer about Kucinich "this man is hurting, he needs help")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident

What in heaven's name are the Democrats doing? We have 48 Congressional Democrats attacking the Catholic Church and Hollings attacking Jews. Talk about Jihad. Let's see how much of their constituency they can alienate by November.


3 posted on 05/20/2004 10:39:46 AM PDT by Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident

YES! And should still not negotiate.


4 posted on 05/20/2004 10:41:48 AM PDT by television is just wrong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
"Sen. Ernest Hollings, a South Carolina Democrat, wrote a column that appeared in several newspapers. The column asserted that the U.S. war against Iraq represented a decision by President George Bush to protect Israel and ensure American Jewish support for his reelection."

What a crock. Hillary referred to the Jews in NY as "those F'in Jews." And she got elected. Most Jews seem to usually vote for Dems.

5 posted on 05/20/2004 10:43:01 AM PDT by Cobra64 (Babes should wear Bullet Bras - www.BulletBras.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: television is just wrong

Hollings can say anything I suppose because he's done for any more elections! He's an anti-semite, along with Hillary CLinton and should be exposed as such for all America to see!


6 posted on 05/20/2004 10:43:03 AM PDT by princess leah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
Did you notice that not a single legislator was named who agrees with Hollings? Not that they don't exist (cf. Cynthia McKinney, Earl Hilliard), but

1) they tend to be liberal RATs;

2) they are considered to be in bad odor (look how Hollings didn't feel comfortable "coming out" until he was going to retire); and

3) because of point #2, they often have problems with re-election.

I think this is a very predictable article from the predictably anti-GOP, anti-neoconservative, anti-Israel, anti-Semitic IHC.

7 posted on 05/20/2004 10:43:39 AM PDT by white trash redneck (Make love, not war. Get married, do both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM

Give ole Fritz a break. He's a senile old fart just following the lib talking points. He knows his fellow dems are weak and his time is very near.


8 posted on 05/20/2004 10:44:03 AM PDT by rj45mis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: princess leah
Hollings put the confederate battle flag on the Capitol when he was governor in 1961. An idiot full of sound and fury--and a faithful hound dog of the trial lawyers.

Any links to the actual article?

9 posted on 05/20/2004 10:45:07 AM PDT by Mamzelle (for a post-neo conservatism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
Hollings said Bush realized that he would be unable to bring about an Arab-Israeli peace to help his reelection efforts. Instead, Bush started laying the groundwork to invade Iraq days after his inauguration in 2001.

Quite an undertaking, all to appeal to, what, 2% of the population. They really do think Bush is stupid, don't they?

Anyway, it's my understanding that the Republicans have always been more pro-Israel than the Dems.

Maybe they should have had Lautenberg checked for senile dementia before they ran him.

10 posted on 05/20/2004 10:45:22 AM PDT by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
"There is a strong fear among American Jewish leadership that the whispering campaign that 'the Jews started it,' will become public," a senior congressional staffer said. "We could be seeing others get on Hollings' bandwagon."

Pat Buchanan and Taki Theodoracopulos must be experiencing ecstasy.

11 posted on 05/20/2004 10:45:29 AM PDT by mrustow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
So ... we went to war with Iraq to stabilize the middle east and make sure that a GREAT friend of our country is not overrun and destroyed? ...and this is wrong because???

Israel is a leading export of technology to the United States, its a good culture, its the home of our religion as well as theirs. Why would we NOT work to their advantage -- because its inevitably to our advantage.

12 posted on 05/20/2004 10:46:34 AM PDT by Naspino (HTTP://NASPINO.COM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM

He is just playing into what I have been hearing a lot of lately on the streets. The propaganda seems to be working.


13 posted on 05/20/2004 10:47:21 AM PDT by John Lenin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
The column reflects a growing sentiment in the corridors of power in Washington according to congressional sources.

What sources???

Got names?

14 posted on 05/20/2004 10:48:41 AM PDT by veronica (Sen. Robert Bryd has seen more hoods than Iraqi prisoners ever wore....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Naspino
Now there's an interesting question. As another Freeper who's handle I don't remember said of Fritz. "There's too much consuming going on."
15 posted on 05/20/2004 10:49:32 AM PDT by .cnI redruM ("Angst is their calling card. Psychotherapy their badge of honor. Dems are the no-no party.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: princess leah

Agreed.


16 posted on 05/20/2004 10:49:41 AM PDT by television is just wrong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM

Does this mean that the "No Blood For Oil" signs will be replaced by "No Blood For Jews" signs?


17 posted on 05/20/2004 10:50:58 AM PDT by Sapper26 (I like W because he shoots first and asks questions later, you get fewer questions that way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pete

They are losing it. It is amusing, sit back and watch, maybe they will fall apart.


18 posted on 05/20/2004 10:51:10 AM PDT by television is just wrong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: veronica

Totally aside from the thrust of the article, but if the Gulf Arab States are so worried about us staying in Iraq, why have they not put a SINGLE SOLDIER there for peacekeeping duties among their fellow Sunni Arabs?


19 posted on 05/20/2004 10:51:10 AM PDT by laconic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: veronica
He overheard some people talking while the used the Senate pissour.
20 posted on 05/20/2004 10:51:53 AM PDT by .cnI redruM ("Angst is their calling card. Psychotherapy their badge of honor. Dems are the no-no party.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson