Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Poundstone

As much as I personally dislike Kerry, I still consider that to be a fair question.

Nader has the potential to control this election. If one is opposed to Bush, then why vote for Nader?

I hope people do, but there is no logic there. None that I can see.


6 posted on 05/20/2004 4:52:13 AM PDT by The Other Harry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: The Other Harry

Kerry doesn't believe in third parties even though they've played important roles throughout American history. Demoncrats want there to me only one choice, theirs.


7 posted on 05/20/2004 5:08:25 AM PDT by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: The Other Harry

Why vote for Nader? Good question. It's the same logic as when FR people, knowing that Bush will need every vote, say they're going to stay home on election day for some reason or another. "That'll show 'em" is the attitude. I just can't understand that way of thinking from a conservative side - it must be much more frustrating for a Dem who's used to people voting in liberal lockstep.


9 posted on 05/20/2004 5:44:32 AM PDT by Moonmad27 (Imagine our country under the "leadership" of a President Kerry. Scary, isn't it?! Vote W in 04!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: The Other Harry

I think you're missing the point. It is extremely presumptous for a media figure to attempt to say who a person should vote for.

Cafferty also slipped up and fails to hide his end game...getting Kerry elected.

He is now attempting to rationalize his stupd Freudian slip.


12 posted on 05/20/2004 6:03:39 AM PDT by rbmillerjr ("When you meet the unbelievers, strike off their heads” Surat Mohammed:4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson