Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kerry Open to OK Anti-Abortion Judges
AP ^ | RON FOURNIER

Posted on 05/19/2004 4:38:34 PM PDT by Sofa King

Wednesday he's open to nominating anti-abortion judges as long as that doesn't lead to the Supreme Court overturning the landmark 1973 ruling that made abortion legal.

(Excerpt) Read more at story.news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: abortion; fournier; judges; judicialnominees; kerry
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
More double-talk from Kerry.

Of course, I doubt Kerry would even nominate an anti-abortion judge even if he did pledge not to overturn Roe vs. Wade.

1 posted on 05/19/2004 4:38:34 PM PDT by Sofa King
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sofa King
Please...that is a bunch of...


2 posted on 05/19/2004 4:42:00 PM PDT by swilhelm73
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sofa King
as that doesn't lead to the Supreme Court overturning the landmark 1973 ruling that made abortion legal.

Which is to say he will NOT appoint one. This is positively Clintonian!

3 posted on 05/19/2004 4:43:41 PM PDT by Mr. Buzzcut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sofa King

Here's a the relevant quotes from Kerry:



"Do they have to agree with me on everything? No," Kerry said. Asked if they must agree with his abortion-rights views, he quickly added, "I will not appoint somebody with a 5-4 Court who's about to undo Roe v. Wade. I've said that before."

"But that doesn't mean that if that's not the balance of the court I wouldn't be prepared ultimately to appoint somebody to some court who has a different point of view. I've already voted for people like that. I voted for Judge Scalia."

Presidents nominate a wide variety of federal judges, including the Supreme Court.

Asked if he regretted that vote, Kerry said, "Yes. Given what he has done on a number of cases." Kerry said he didn't see at the time "such a level of ideology and partisanship" he now sees in Scalia.


4 posted on 05/19/2004 4:46:24 PM PDT by Sofa King (MY rights are not subject to YOUR approval http://www.angelfire.com/art2/sofaking/index.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Buzzcut
The Associated Press he regrets his 1986 vote to confirm Antonin Scalia (news - web sites).

"If you're looking for me to admit that I made a mistake in my years in the Senate, there you go — there's one," said the four-term Massachusetts senator.

What a d-ck this guy is. Scalia is ten times the man this gold-digging mediocrity is.

5 posted on 05/19/2004 4:47:28 PM PDT by Mr. Buzzcut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Buzzcut

He can't take a solid position on anything.

He's willing to nominate an pro-life judge, but not if he's really pro-life, but he would nominate someone who disagrees with him, but not if it's a deciding vote, and he offers up Scalia as proof that he would do so, but it was a mistake...


6 posted on 05/19/2004 4:50:35 PM PDT by Sofa King (MY rights are not subject to YOUR approval http://www.angelfire.com/art2/sofaking/index.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sofa King

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1138796/posts


7 posted on 05/19/2004 4:50:59 PM PDT by pookie18
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sofa King

Anyone who believes this has the IQ of a can of Spam.


8 posted on 05/19/2004 4:51:26 PM PDT by no dems (Does the Bush/Cheney camp monitor the Freep website?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sofa King

Who is Kerry trying to appease here? Conservatives aren't going to vote for him regardless what he says.


9 posted on 05/19/2004 4:54:44 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Extremer than any Extremist!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pookie18

Oops. Looks like my search was set on "search by poster"

Oh well. It's been double posted. Life will go on.


10 posted on 05/19/2004 4:54:49 PM PDT by Sofa King (MY rights are not subject to YOUR approval http://www.angelfire.com/art2/sofaking/index.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sofa King

So this what Nadar told him to say, eh?


11 posted on 05/19/2004 4:56:51 PM PDT by mabelkitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sofa King

No problem. Just thought you'd like to see the other comments...including mine ;-)


12 posted on 05/19/2004 4:58:07 PM PDT by pookie18
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: no dems
Anyone who believes this has the IQ of a can of Spam.

Spam, ketchup and kerry - wow, what a combo meal.
13 posted on 05/19/2004 4:59:49 PM PDT by gipper81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

Pro-life democrats in states like Iowa, Missouri, Nebraska, etc. There are a LOT of them (some 30+% of Dems in Iowa, for example), but they are silenced by the official party so you don't hear about them.


14 posted on 05/19/2004 5:07:13 PM PDT by Lexinom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Sofa King
What a crock, Kerry will nominate the judges NOW and his personal cash cow tell him to.
15 posted on 05/19/2004 5:10:33 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (Kerry: The Arrogance of Amerika)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sofa King

Kerry has already has stated a litmus test to appointing judges, that they don't appose Roe v. Wade. Typical of Kerry, take a stand and then retreat. Must be the French blood in him...


16 posted on 05/19/2004 5:11:51 PM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Who is Kerry trying to appease here?

moderates, independents and wishy-washy types.

17 posted on 05/19/2004 5:20:09 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
That's going to hurt him in the election. He knows it, hence the _stated_ softening on his hardcare stance.

NOW/PP's bark is now worse than their bite. They can no longer paint those who value life more than whim into a little "extremist" corner, the press notwithstanding. Sentiment has steadily been shifting in America. Democrats for Life documents the electoral advantages of the pro-life position. It's small, but shifted from where it was a decade ago, and in a close election...

This is a play to the close Midwestern states, since the extreme hardcore pro-abort states like CA and NY are his anyways. It's actually a shrewd move, even if it is just talk.

18 posted on 05/19/2004 5:22:10 PM PDT by Lexinom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Sofa King

There is nothing this weenie won't say to get elected. In the immortal words of famed intellectual B. Bunny, "What a maroooon!"


19 posted on 05/19/2004 5:31:51 PM PDT by grellis (Mi sento male. Ho fatto un'indigestione!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sofa King

I hope that statement was caught on tape. Right after it the RNC could play the tape where NARAL's head witch was lecturing all nine dwarves that they had to filibuster any judge who wouldn't toe their line.


20 posted on 05/19/2004 6:13:09 PM PDT by Dilbert56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson