Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ABU GHRAIB ABUSES FUEL CAMPAIGN FOR INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT
New American ^ | 5/31/2004 Issue | Staff

Posted on 05/19/2004 6:41:00 AM PDT by JesseHousman

The International Criminal Court (ICC), which had receded into the shadows over the past few years, may soon be back in the limelight, propelled by sensational stories and photos indicating that some U.S. military personnel and civilian contractors grossly abused prisoners at Iraq’s Abu Ghraib prison. This is certain to fuel a campaign to bring international war crimes charges against U.S. citizens serving in Iraq. This, in turn, will reignite a full-scale campaign to empower the new ICC, which was launched at the UN’s 1998 Rome Conference on the Establishment of an International Criminal Court. One of the principal non-governmental organizations leading the noisy and influential NGO contingent at the Rome summit was Amnesty International.

In a May 7 open letter to U.S. President George W. Bush, Amnesty International said that abuses allegedly committed by U.S. agents in the Abu Ghraib facility in Baghdad were war crimes, and the organization called on the administration to fully investigate them "to ensure that there is no impunity for anyone found responsible regardless of position or rank."

Following orders? Why did American soldiers commit abuses at Abu Ghraib and record their crimes on film? For "psy-op reasons," according to Private Lynndie England, who insists that she was following orders from "persons in my higher chain of command." Release of the photos has damaged our military’s reputation, and the scandal may enhance the supposed credibility of the UN’s ICC. (Source: Newscom)

Amnesty International said that it has documented a pattern of abuse by U.S. agents against detainees, including in Iraq and Afghanistan, stretching back over the past two years. Those responsible for these crimes, it said, "should be brought to justice in accordance with the USA’s obligations under international and US law. Investigations should cover the higher chain of command responsibility as well as direct perpetrators."


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: abughraib; amnesty; icc; jbs; johnbirchsociety; lynndie; trailertrash
... bring international war crimes charges against U.S. citizens serving in Iraq...Ridiculous.

Just comb the 201 files of mil pers and weed out those whose IQ's barely approach room temperature.

1 posted on 05/19/2004 6:41:01 AM PDT by JesseHousman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JesseHousman

ICC?
ABSOLUTELY NO!!!!
We'll take care of our own, thank-you. We will not be treated like some dirty backwater collection of machety weilding criminals.
And you KNOW thats how it will be...US vs the rest of the world. Constantly and only.


2 posted on 05/19/2004 6:58:19 AM PDT by Adder (Can we bring back stoning again? Please?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JesseHousman

ICC for American soldiers my ass.


3 posted on 05/19/2004 7:01:09 AM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JesseHousman

PROOF that we should not sign this treaty!


4 posted on 05/19/2004 7:01:51 AM PDT by taxcontrol (People are entitled to their opinion - no matter how wrong it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JesseHousman
The ICC would go after Bush, Powell and Rummy first.
5 posted on 05/19/2004 7:07:45 AM PDT by Mike Darancette (Kerry: The Arrogance of Amerika)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Gee, I was always fond of the idea of this being a sovereign nation, as opposed to this being a nation controlled by random leftists scattered throughout the world... step one is to pull out of that bureaucratic mess, the U.N.
6 posted on 05/19/2004 7:12:29 AM PDT by Republican Rizzo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Republican Rizzo

What part of NO don't they understand ?


7 posted on 05/19/2004 7:25:12 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JesseHousman

INTREP


8 posted on 05/19/2004 8:28:46 AM PDT by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson