Well, duh. Naturally, the Patsies aren't the ones who introduce Pat's endorsement of Holocaust-denier pseudoscience, just as Clintonistas aren't the ones who introduce the parsing of the reflexive verb.
Quite a bit of gibberish, which intones pretty much as an inside joke among the anti-Buchanan element. That gibberish conveniently communicates nothing to those of us who have not accepted your premises. Could you please explain, if you can, what any of that mixed collection of English and newspeak has to do with the actual subject? What does it say as to whether or not Pat is on the mark in attacking the efforts by several named advocates for our sticking our noses in other people's cultures? How does any of it justify our meddling, in order to impose a Feminist agenda, that most Conservatives reject in our own culture, on other peoples?
And if you care to translate that gibberish into English that tells us just what you are accusing Pat Buchanan of, we just might get you some answers as to whether you have made any point against Pat on some other subject, whether germane to this particular thread or not.
Academic "buzz words," if that was what you intended, might work with intimidated sophomorish coeds. They don't cut much ice in this Forum.
William Flax