Hitler was the leading exponent, in his time, of the idea of using armed force to impose your social values on other peoples. Pat is the exact opposite.
In this particular essay, he is assailing the idea that certain crack-pots--or what else can we call them--want to jeopardize the American future, by antagonizing a large slice of humanity, by trying to foist the absurd values of American Feminists on them. If you think the individuals whom Pat mentions in the above essay can be defended, by all means defend them. But suggesting that a patriotic American Conservative is "Hitlarian," does not advance either civil discourse, nor afford any reason whatsoever why the rest of us should not applaud Pat's essay.
He hates what his country is, enough to endorse our enemies. How is that ONE WHIT different than the Leftists at ANSWER, or indeed our enemies themselves?
ANSWER, no doubt, would ALSO claim that they "really" want what is "best" for America, which of course is their OWN vision of it, much like Pat.