Posted on 05/18/2004 9:23:50 AM PDT by Living Free in NH
Hey, It was me who asked the question, not petronsky....
I need a lil credit for sarcastic wit now and again.
"Please engage us on a substantive level; give us the REAL reasons you're against our involvement in Iraq."
What scares me is that this...this...this...person DOES think he's giving legitimate reasons why he opposes the war in Iraq and has a dislike for our country.
"Who is John Galt?"
A figment of STUPIDITY ready to be FLUSHED.
My sincerest apologies.
Mr Frranken is that you? Come on Al fess up we know it's you. Not WMD's tell it to the Kurds
In Gaults twisted definitions of what a WMD "is". The chemical (Mustard gas) and the biological (Sarin) shells that were used in combination against the Kurds wern't WMD's.
I wonder how the people still suffering from the physical effects of that deadly coctail would believe Gault's theory on what constitutes a WMD?
How could anyone?
TX thanks for your service to our country we are better off because of it!
I believe Sarin is considered a chemical nerve agent, not biological.
"The military doesn't protect my rights, that is my responsibility."
In the words of John McLaughlin, WRROOOONG! Ah, the old "citizen of the world", Idiots Without Borders superciliousness. That's like saying from a coach seat that the pilot and airplane don't keep me airborne, that is my responsibility.
"And if it was your job, you are doing a lousy piece of work I might add."
ISSUE #2 - WROOONNG AGAIN! How many terrorist attacks have there been in the USA since 9/11?
"Each year, Americans have fewer 'rights' and worse, an army of real invaders from Mexico secured a capitulation from the DC-tax regime."
ISSUE #3 - You are at least partially right on this one, Pat.
"You are an enforcer for the DC-tax regime and the policy dreamed up by Ivy League dateless wonders."
ISSUE #4 - Any time anyone serves in the military for a government that doesn't 100% reflect the views and policies of said anyone (which is +/-100% of the time, give or take 0%), said anyone is, by your definition, an "enforcer" for the (fill in the blank) Regime.
ISSUE #5 - Should we be frightened if the Chinese consider the war on terror "quaint"? If so, why?
I'm shocked...SHOCKED at the deafening silence from Gault when it comes to actually answering the questions youposed to him.
Shocked that he didn't have a witty retort of mindless drivel...but not overly surprised.
I think he's more Buchanan Brigade than a Lefty...
"I think he's more Buchanan Brigade than a Lefty..."
Really? I think even Pat might see that we now have proof that WMD still exists in Iraq.
I was thinking that Gault might have a "Lyndon LaRouche for Pres." bumpersticker on his car.
Okay, yeah I'll buy that. The LaRouche/Buchanan wing of the Deform Party...
Other DU spin: since it wasn't fired from an artillery piece, the binary chemicals didn't mix properly and therefore it wasn't a WMD.
It was OLD, so it doesn't count because it was a leftover from the Iran-Iraq war.
It wasn't Saddam's, it was his family's.
He's a new breed of libertarianism, the republitarian, or liberpublican. There are many of us. I think the libertarian party, which was full of hope in the 90's, has gone off the deep end.
Orwell didn't know the half of it, huh? Hey, Galt -- is a fork still a fork if you use it to pry open a paint can lid?
It's a shame that the anarchists and tin hat kooks have hijacked your party and turned it from as you say the "liberpublicans" into the vile Liberaltarians who, when they open their mouths, prove theselves more vile than the RATS of the DNC.
Hopefully Liberpublicans can make a return.
And what does "is" mean anyway?
rotf, very good. New, standard enemy of mankind defense.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.