Posted on 05/18/2004 1:31:07 AM PDT by kattracks
Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Not a problem. Islam is not a religion. It's a cult or a political system. No body of beliefs that holds to human sacrifice (Kill an infidel for allah today!) as islam does is a valid religion.
Not a problem. Islam is not a religion.
You do realize that there are no cash prizes for the stupid statement of the day.
Etymology: Middle English religioun, from Latin religion-, religio supernatural constraint, sanction, religious practice, perhaps from religare to restrain, tie back —more at RELY
Date: 13th century
the service and worship of God or the supernatural (2) : commitment or devotion to religious faith or observance
2 : a personal set or institutionalized system of religious attitudes, beliefs, and practices
a cause, principle, or system of beliefs held to with ardor and faith.
Now you or I may may not like Islam, we may even agree that it's a false religion, but to say it's not a religion is world class the moon is made of green cheese stupid, and you know (or should) know better.
It's probably me, but I'm not sure what your point is? There are Muslims serving today and (I'm assuming) honorably.
It's probably me, but I'm not sure what your point is? There are Muslims serving today and (I'm assuming) honorably.
SIGH
Yes, there are. My point is that in previous wars, the group whose loyalty was most in doubt (Germans in WW I, Japanese in WW II) served in DISPROPORTIONATE number to other groups in the armed forces. I guess I'd like to see some indication that Muslims were especially anxious to prove their loyalty through this kind of service, only because that seems to be the response of previous groups.
Is scientology a religion? Not in some places. How about satanism (with human sacrifice)? Not in the US. These things are classed as cults not as religions. Same as islam should be.
Are they really or is it merely biding their time ? I am by no means a conspiracy nut but I see no evidence of honorable conduct. IMO, their twisted loyality to Allah borders on the manacial and supercedes reason even among those considered "moderate".
If the benign Moslems remain silet they are lumping themselves in with the enemey when the backlash comes.
Perhaps the silence is in shame that they do not honor the religion by joining the jihad.
this is rue as it stands. So long as one of these people lives Islam will be at war with the rest of humanity. The R.O.H. may not realize it for a time because the saracen is not strong enough or perceives the R.O.H. as too strong.
LOL!
Southeast Asia specialist Dr. Greg Barton of Australia's Deakin University said Monday that Abdullah was "not so very different from Mahathir in concrete policy terms, but a world away in terms of his line of rhetoric, and that's critical."
So the bum talks softer, so what? There is a huge difference between the constitutions protections and those who would use those protections to destroy the document. Muslims, globalists and liberals fall into the destrutive catagory and are not entitled to those protections. So says the Patriot Act anyway in regards to terrorists, and terrorist supporters which muslims, liberals and globalists fall into as far as thinking people are concerned.
On sale here in the US, and an origin named.
The author of this article has once again failed to identify himself as a moslem convert!
This is deceptive. He's opposed only to the wahhabi brand of the sect.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.