Skip to comments.
Sarin not evidence of WMD: Blix
Melbourne Herald Sun ^
| 18 May, 2004
| Matt Moore
Posted on 05/17/2004 8:20:19 PM PDT by yatros from flatwater
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-185 next last
To: RaceBannon
21
posted on
05/17/2004 8:31:46 PM PDT
by
nutmeg
(Why vote for Bush? Imagine Commander in Chief John F’in al-Qerry)
To: yatros from flatwater
Let's remember that Blix never personally set foot in Iraq to verify Iraq was in compliance with UN Resolutions. So why is he called "former weapons inspector" ?
So Blix NEVER could have found anything.
To: yatros from flatwater
Been awhile since I got to use this tagline...
To: TYVets
I'd rather see him be Lynnde's next POW.
24
posted on
05/17/2004 8:32:18 PM PDT
by
DLfromthedesert
(I was elected in AZ as an alt delegate to the Convention. I'M GOING TO NY)
To: yatros from flatwater
Wasn't there a story last week how documents uncovered in Baghdad showed that a member of Blix's inspection team was on Saddam's payroll?
To: highlander_UW
To: yatros from flatwater
Isn't Blix from Germany? Can you imagine the $$$ he and his UN buddies were getting from the food for oil scheme?
27
posted on
05/17/2004 8:33:57 PM PDT
by
Liberty Valance
(Keep a simple manner for a happy life)
To: yatros from flatwater
Blix wouldn't know a chemical or biological weapon if it were shoved up his butt and set off..... Amazing that he maintains his ignorance even after Saddams payoffs have been cut off (or is he still getting some funds from someone else?).
28
posted on
05/17/2004 8:36:01 PM PDT
by
TheBattman
(Leadership = http://www.georgewbush.com/)
To: go star go
Oh, and pregnancy isn't necessarily evidence of prior sexual congress.
To: yatros from flatwater
OK, so Blix says, "Finding WMD is no proof of WMD." What credibility!
To: yatros from flatwater
Hans: Your bias is showing.
31
posted on
05/17/2004 8:39:28 PM PDT
by
Finalapproach29er
(" Permitting homosexuality didn't work out very well for the Roman Empire")
To: ozzymandus
Nothing to see here folks...Move along please...Nothing to see here...
Inspector "Clueless" strikes again!!!
Follow the money people...FOLLOW THE MONEY!!!
32
posted on
05/17/2004 8:41:26 PM PDT
by
FlashBack
(USA...USA...USA...USA...USA...USA...USA...USA...USA...USA..USA...USA!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
To: yatros from flatwater
How did this guy get to be a weapons inspector? Don't you have to have some kind of desire to find weapons instead of immediately talking down incriminating evidence?
33
posted on
05/17/2004 8:42:08 PM PDT
by
bethelgrad
(for God, country, and the Corps OOH RAH!)
To: yatros from flatwater
"It doesn't sound absurd at all. There can be debris from the past and that's a very different thing from having stockpiles and supplies," he said. When you lose the argument, change the basis of the argument--and hope no one notices.
I don't recall anyone justifying the invasion of Iraq over "stockpiles" of WMD. I distinctly remember the justification being that we didn't want WMD getting into terrorists' hands.
34
posted on
05/17/2004 8:44:40 PM PDT
by
Samwise
(The new media motto: All the news that fits our agenda.)
To: yatros from flatwater
Everybody please read this article posted 4/28/04 and email it around. We FOUND WMDs in IRAQ!!!!!!!!!!
Don't let the media-fascists bury this story!
35
posted on
05/17/2004 8:45:04 PM PDT
by
Grim
To: yatros from flatwater
OMG! Do you realize what this means??? THE SARIN GAS IS ABLE TO CREATE ITSELF OUT OF THIN AIR!! IT'S ALIVE!!! IT'S ALIIIIIIVE...
/sarcasm OFF
To: yatros from flatwater
NEWS FLASH
Smoke NOT Evidence of fire! .....Details at 10:00
37
posted on
05/17/2004 8:47:38 PM PDT
by
TnGOP
(Petey the dog is my foriegn policy advisor. He's really quite good!)
To: yatros from flatwater
"FORMER chief UN weapons inspector Hans Blix said that a shell containing sarin nerve gas used in an attack in Iraq was most likely a stray weapon possibly from the first Gulf War."
We also must not discount a possible Babylonian origin.
38
posted on
05/17/2004 8:50:04 PM PDT
by
hauerf
To: Samwise
We must read between the lines here.
When he says these shells are 'debris from the past', he means that ANY chem/bio we find is irrelevent because Saddam's regime hadn't made it the month before invasion. We could find a thousand shells that would be considered 'debris from the past'.
Ignorance is indeed Blix. And ignorance could very well get us all killed.
39
posted on
05/17/2004 8:51:13 PM PDT
by
ex 98C MI Dude
(Proud Member of the Republican Attack Squad)
To: yatros from flatwater
[Blix said today that the discovery of the nerve agent was not a sign that Saddam Hussein's regime possessed weapons of mass destruction before the war last year.]
This of course depends on the meaning of "possessed". Just because WMD was "found" there doesn't necessarily mean that they "possessed" it. Bill Clinton could expalin this better than me.
40
posted on
05/17/2004 8:53:26 PM PDT
by
Mad_Tom_Rackham
(Any day you wake up is a good day.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-185 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson