To: yatros from flatwater
Let's remember that Blix never personally set foot in Iraq to verify Iraq was in compliance with UN Resolutions. So why is he called "former weapons inspector" ?
So Blix NEVER could have found anything.
To: stylin19a
Let's remember that Blix never personally set foot in Iraq to verify Iraq was in compliance with UN Resolutions. So why is he called "former weapons inspector" ? So Blix NEVER could have found anything. Does fact that GW never personally lead an attack in Iraq or Afghanistan mean that he's not the Commander in Chief?
126 posted on
05/18/2004 7:58:20 AM PDT by
Dave S
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson