On a purely superficial level, I think it sullies the spirit of the Constitution to even MENTION homosexuality. Just like it was dumb to use it to prohibit alcohol. I just wish legislators in America would grow the cajones to impeach judges that are trying to impose its legality.
Yes I agree, but how many new judges has Bush been able to appoint? You need an even greater margin (66 votes) to impeach. The constitutional ammendment will not mention homosexuality, of beastiality, or poligamy, or any other "marriages that people will soon ask for.) Only prescribing who is eligible for marriage in the US. Sad that it comes to this, but the left is a powerful lobby, and will not quit until people have no right to discriminate at all. (Soon they will go after No shoes, No shirt, No service.)