To: Know your rights
What's to explain? "Irreducible" doesn't refer to the degree of the complexity.I wanted you to explain how a progenitor race would evolve from non-living matter into a race far more advanced than us, yet retain reducable systems.
81 posted on
05/18/2004 11:34:54 AM PDT by
Shryke
(Never retreat. Never explain. Get it done and let them howl.)
To: Shryke
I wanted you to explain how a progenitor race would evolve from non-living matter into a race far more advanced than us, yet retain reducable systems.Why shouldn't they retain reducible systems? Increasing complexity in no way implies or requires a shift from reducible complexity to irreducible complexity.
85 posted on
05/18/2004 12:35:36 PM PDT by
Know your rights
(The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson