Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Defects In Aging Passenger Jets Exposed [Boeing]
KIRO 7 Eyewitness News Special Report ^ | 05.05.2004 | Kris Halsne

Posted on 05/15/2004 5:30:08 PM PDT by Indie

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

1 posted on 05/15/2004 5:30:08 PM PDT by Indie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Indie

I guess Bondo wouldn't help a whole lot with this.


2 posted on 05/15/2004 5:37:18 PM PDT by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Indie
Age of an aircraft is not an issue. The real issue is how well is it inspected and maintained. Like any piece of equipment, an aircraft must be serviced and undergo regular maintenance or else it will suffer some kind of structural failure.

Look at how many 707's, 727's, DC-8's, and DC-9's are still flying after 30-40+ years of service.

3 posted on 05/15/2004 5:41:49 PM PDT by COEXERJ145
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145

Heck there are DC-3's still flying.


4 posted on 05/15/2004 5:45:55 PM PDT by delapaz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: delapaz
Heck there are DC-3's still flying.

Exactly. Another example, though not a passenger aircraft, is the B-52.

5 posted on 05/15/2004 5:50:46 PM PDT by COEXERJ145
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Indie

those pesky box cutters again!


6 posted on 05/15/2004 5:52:16 PM PDT by rageaholic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145
Age of an aircraft is not an issue.

More at issue is cycles take off and landing pressurized de pressurize and also those pesky

"center fuel tanks"
7 posted on 05/15/2004 5:58:04 PM PDT by al baby (Hope I don't get into trouble for this)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: al baby
More at issue is cycles

Yeah, that's correct and I feel stupid for not saying it. DOH! :)

8 posted on 05/15/2004 5:59:18 PM PDT by COEXERJ145
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145

Amen to that. It's a treat, anymore, to see one of those venerable 4-engine monsters fly over... All the other planes are pretty much the same - blah.


9 posted on 05/15/2004 6:02:09 PM PDT by Lexinom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Larry Lucido
Knowledgeable sources report that the marginally famed EU aircraft consortium also has some unique ideas and cost-saving techniques on what would otherwise be known as construcive metallurgy....
Hence the nickname "scare-bus".....

Regards,

10 posted on 05/15/2004 6:03:25 PM PDT by Wings-n-Wind (The answers are out there; Wisdom is found by asking the right questions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Larry Lucido
Knowledgeable sources report that the marginally famed EU aircraft consortium also has some unique ideas and cost-saving techniques on what would otherwise be known as construcive metallurgy....
Hence the nickname "scare-bus".....

Regards,

11 posted on 05/15/2004 6:03:27 PM PDT by Wings-n-Wind (The answers are out there; Wisdom is found by asking the right questions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145
Look at how many 707's, 727's, DC-8's, and DC-9's are still flying after 30-40+ years of service.

I dont look back at the 40 years of service that one plane might have performed. I worry about the upcoming 41st year.

12 posted on 05/15/2004 6:05:57 PM PDT by lowbridge ("You are an American. You are my brother. I would die for you." -Kurdish Sergeant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Indie

It's not a Boeing issue, it's a box-cutter issue. Obviously you don't take a knife to an airplane wing.

This story couldn't come at a worse time, however. Last month's balance of payments deficit shot up because of massive imports from Airbus Industries.


13 posted on 05/15/2004 6:09:15 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145
"Exactly. Another example, though not a passenger aircraft, is the B-52."

The youngest B-52 is at least 40 years old! Amazing!

14 posted on 05/15/2004 6:13:06 PM PDT by Sen Jack S. Fogbound (Let there be Term Limits!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sen Jack S. Fogbound

A total of 744 B-52s were built with the last, a B-52H, delivered in October 1962.


15 posted on 05/15/2004 6:17:52 PM PDT by Sen Jack S. Fogbound (Let there be Term Limits!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Indie

I don't fly, but if I had to it would be 737-600+ or 777 only now. I want something brand new.


16 posted on 05/15/2004 6:20:06 PM PDT by Monty22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Indie
KIRO 7 Eyewitness News Investigative Reporter Chris Halsne discovers a big new problem for Boeing, centered on "lap-joint metal fatigue".

I've seen this air-blown airhead. I won't talk about (IMHO) he couldn't even discover, but to "discover" something like this -- naah, somebody told him.

But then the self-promotional hype of Seattle television "news" is so awful I quit watching it sometime in back in the 80s. The early 80s... (i.e. just after I moved there).

17 posted on 05/15/2004 6:22:11 PM PDT by sionnsar (sionnsar: the part of the bagpipe where the melody comes out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sen Jack S. Fogbound

Hmmm was the study done by the Airbus...


18 posted on 05/15/2004 6:22:19 PM PDT by Flavius ("... we should reconnoitre assiduosly... " Vegetius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Indie
Yeesh. What a sensationalistic hit-piece article of crap. Boeing has been aware of and publicly dealing with the lap joint issue for years!! I just talked to a guy last week about it!

I love how they are Boeing jets to KIRO, even the ones that were sold 30 years ago! Boeing hasn't made 737-200s for a long time!

Once the airplane is sold to an airline, it is the airline's responsibility to maintain it. Boeing does advise the airlines on how to maintain the aircraft and problems to look out for, but if the airline doesn't follow federally-prescribed and audited maintenance, it is not Boeing's fault when that airplane falls apart.

Is it Ford's fault that the floor of the trunk of my 1972 Maverick rusted through because I failed to check and maintain the seals on a 30+ year-old car and to make sure water that got in didn't sit there?

19 posted on 05/15/2004 6:23:20 PM PDT by SW6906
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge
Well... I'm not an aviation engineering expert, but if the trend in automobiles has ANY carryover to aviation (doesn't have to be full carryover) maybe we do have something to worry about. The B707 made its first flight in 1954; the DC-8: 1958. The only (big, civil) jet before that was the Comet, and boy, what I wouldn't give to see and hear one of those in flight!!!

Having said all that, for some of us the worry over the "cost measures" taken by companies who have more concern over the "bottom line" than over human life - which, BTW, has been considerably cheapened over the last 50 years - exceeds concern over the airworthiness of older aircraft which were built in a different era with a different mindset.

20 posted on 05/15/2004 6:24:08 PM PDT by Lexinom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson