[BillyBoy]

Schaffer seems to be trying to paint himself as Mr. Conservative by telling Republicans whatever they want to hear while implying Coors is a RINO because he doesn't have a record to back up his strong statements.

It seems to m that Coors would be a far better candidate precisely because he's a new face on the scene who DOES tell things like it is.

Also, perhaps Schaffer can explain why his website is hispandering to people who are too lazy to learn English. Coors' website doesn't containly any eager updates "en espanol"

[ModelBreaker]

Schaffer seems to be trying to paint himself as Mr. Conservative by telling Republicans whatever they want to hear while implying Coors is a RINO because he doesn't have a record to back up his strong statements.

Schaffer IS Mr. Conservative. There's a reason that Tom Tancredo and Mike Coffman introduced Schaffer at his campaign kickoff. There's a reason Bill Armstrong endorses Schaffer, not Coors. Take a look at Bob's record.

Coors will get clobbered by Salazar. He won't be able to duck debates against Salazar the way he is ducking them against Schaffer. And unless I see Coors in public, on his feet, making good decisions and presenting them persuasively before the State convention, I'm voting Schaffer. A media campaign will only get Coors so far.

One more point. Coors has no voting record for us to look to. I have no idea whether or not he will 'grow' once he hits Washington.

Bob is an experienced campaigner, a good speaker, and a very attractive personality.

Don't get me wrong, if Coors wins the nomination, I will be walking precincts for him. But I think Schaffer is far and away the better candidate.