We invented the term "open marriage", not gays.
We promoted the notion of a no-fault divorce.
Straights invented wife swapping, swinging, and cohabitation.
None of those things ever impacted the sanctity of MY marriage, because the existence of evil does not overshadow the existence of good.
At best, there are apostates mocking the sacrament of marriage, and civil magistrates conducting civil unions.
The sanctity of my marriage is not impacted by the actions of either heterosexual or homosexual individuals.
How does it feel to know your marriage is on the same level as this perversion.
But we're not talking about individual marriages, are we? We're talking about the institution of marriage. And if two guys can get married, why not two guys and a gal, for example? And thanks to the full faith and credit clause, if I understand this correctly, can't MA use that to shove their definition of marriage down the rest of the nation's colective throat? If so, marriage as an institution is meaningless.
"Impacted"??
No, merely obliterated into little pieces the way ALL past and honorable tradition is being obliterated.
What we are surrendering to is the paving of way for the "new, improved sanctity" of Secular Humanism's 'New World Order.'