Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: discostu
By your interpretation if they wanted to shut the street down it would be OK because they're protesting.

The street is already shut down by the motorcade. And it is not closed to onlookers. The only distinction of who is allowed to stay is the content of political speech. And no legitimate safety concern had been sited against protesters.

I think that's unconstitutional, you do not. We'll have to agree to disagree on this.

369 posted on 05/14/2004 3:34:20 PM PDT by freeeee ("Owning" property in the US just means you have one less landlord)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 366 | View Replies ]


To: freeeee

It isn't unconstitutional. This isn't a matter of "think" this is a matter of jurisprudence, it has been well established that seperating sides is not unconstitutional as long as both sides get an opportunity to speak. It's not a matter of agreeing to disagree, you are wrong, think what you want it doesn't change the facts and the facts are that no one's First Ammendment rights were violated in any way.


403 posted on 05/15/2004 12:19:33 PM PDT by discostu (Brick urgently required, must be thick and well kept)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 369 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson