Some folks just like getting mad about stuff, and that's OK. I can see being disappointed in W for this, I can see protesting against it, writing about how wrong it is, and even voting against him because of it. Those are all worthy and justifiable reactions (I'm a little disappointed, but that's as far as I'm going). What annoys me is when people feel a need to legitimize their anger with crappy interpretations of the Constitution. Just because something shouldn't have happened (which this probably shouldn't have) doesn't make it a violation of the Constitution.
You're exactly right, and furthermore, I'm maintaining (post #264) that John Nichols whipped up a batch of Stone Soup from the arrest of one guy, and freeeee and his buds are sucking it down like it's their first meal in a week.