Read page 5. It says content specific restriction can be made but must face "strict scrutiny". Gee, didn't I say content specific restrictions were legal? Yes, yes I did.
Uhhh, and do you know anything about the legal concept of "strict scrutiny". Obviously not.
This is getting ridiculous. The more you post on a subject you know painfully little about, the more you expose yourself.
I'll give you this -- you did bring up the anti-abortion case from Colorado that was decided by the Supreme Court.
That decision, however, was among the Supreme Court's worst re: free speech in quite some time. I'm assuming you didn't agree with it(?).