Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: discostu
crowd control is LEGAL

Leaving supporters in place and threatening dissenters with arrest is a violation of the 1st Amendment.

Is this discrimination based on dissent legal? The courts might think so. But then they're not only supporting a violation of free speech, but engaging in judicial activism as well.

207 posted on 05/14/2004 11:11:36 AM PDT by freeeee ("Owning" property in the US just means you have one less landlord)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies ]


To: freeeee

It's not descrimination. Seperating sides during protests is fairly common. Every seen KKK marches, they tend to have counter protests, those counter protests are shoved to the other side of the street at least. Why? Because: crowd control is LEGAL, and putting people with a certain type of sign in a certain area with people that have similar signs IS crowd control.


212 posted on 05/14/2004 11:17:03 AM PDT by discostu (Brick urgently required, must be thick and well kept)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies ]

To: freeeee
Don't let the imbecilic piranahs get to you. They can't seem to adress the free speech issue, so they go after you.

Every single person attacking you would rightuflly howl like little squealing piglets if it were the Klintons prohibiting protest signs.

Which makes them hypocrites and quite possibly liars.

215 posted on 05/14/2004 11:21:13 AM PDT by AAABEST (<a href="http://www.angelqueen.org/forum">Traditional Catholic News Forum</a>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson