Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gdani

No my above asserting is 100% ACCURATE, in fact it's entirely in line with CENTURIES (we've been around over 200 years you know) of well established Constituional law.


197 posted on 05/14/2004 10:55:12 AM PDT by discostu (Brick urgently required, must be thick and well kept)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies ]


To: discostu
No my above asserting is 100% ACCURATE, in fact it's entirely in line with CENTURIES (we've been around over 200 years you know) of well established Constituional law.

I said "decades" because it wasn't until, say, the 1930s-1940s that the Supreme Court started to take the concept of free speech seriously.

The idea that the Govt cannot censor speech based on its content is the entire purpose of the right to free speech.

There are *literally* hundreds of federal court cases that say just that with plaintiffs ranging from Jevohah's Witnesses to the NAACP to anti-abortion demonstrators.

Sorry you didn't get the memo.

206 posted on 05/14/2004 11:07:53 AM PDT by gdani (letting the marketplace decide = conservatism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson