Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

When King George travels, liberties suffer
The Capital Times ^ | May 13, 2004 | John Nichols

Posted on 05/14/2004 8:20:31 AM PDT by freeeee

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 421-438 next last
To: Hacksaw
BFD.

Yes, I know free speech and assembly aren't important to you.

61 posted on 05/14/2004 8:59:25 AM PDT by freeeee ("Owning" property in the US just means you have one less landlord)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: freeeee

So, from now on, any president that is making a campaign stop needs to monetarily reimburse everyone inconvenienced, needs to pay to keep order everytime the local University turns out it's typical mob, and is encouraged to allow said mob to shout him down wherever they may turn up. Does freedom of speech also mean that when I am exercising that right, that someone else must be forced to hear that speech in order to fulfill that right?


62 posted on 05/14/2004 9:00:16 AM PDT by SoDak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freeeee

The Cap Times is still pitching it after all these years, eh? When I was at UW, the conservative club mocking named its annual freedom award after William T. Evjue, legendary leftist editor of the Times. The paper fumed but there wasn't anything they could do about it.


63 posted on 05/14/2004 9:00:22 AM PDT by T'wit ("To educate a man in mind and not in morals is to educate a menace to society" - Theodore Roosevelt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freeeee
No mention, of course, of Bush's immediate predecessor King Slick and his $350 haircut on Air Force 1 at LAX back in the first months of his presidency. commercial airline traffic was held up at the nations busiest airport for over two hours while Slick's Hollywood stylist was summoned to AF 1 to work his trade.
64 posted on 05/14/2004 9:01:57 AM PDT by BluH2o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freeeee

Blah blah blah

The President came through our area a few weeks ago. No "no-free-speech" zone. Anyone could line up anywhere along the 10+ miles his motorcade drove on.

One guy did, protesting about no jobs. One.

Amazingly, I wasn't allowed to block the road and make the President's motorcade stop so he could shake my hand, and I like the guy. Imagine that.

With the level of hatred against the President in the country right now, I'm not surprised by this. Was there no where (bridges/overpasses, hillsides etc) these people could have "free-speeched"? Just because we have a first amendment, doesn't mean people are allowed to get in his face to disagree with him.


65 posted on 05/14/2004 9:02:11 AM PDT by eyespysomething (The Barbarians are at the Gates. Don't give Kerry the key!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freeeee

W should have had the decency to parade on foot like Hillary in NYC. Then his royal minions could have beat the snot out of dissenters (like Hillary).

Get over it. The Secret Service is following policies put in place over 10 years ago. I speak from experience in trying to exercize free speach against the Clintons.


66 posted on 05/14/2004 9:02:53 AM PDT by TC Rider (The United States Constitution © 1791. All Rights Reserved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Dane
Rather have that than being taught by a liberal writer filled with irrational animus.

Yes, Dane. I know the SOP of "killing the messenger" when the facts are embarassing.

But I don't play that game. I don't care who wrote the article. I care that Americans were denied free speech and assembly because of their political views while others who cheerlead the government are not.

Go on, surprise me and actually address that point.

67 posted on 05/14/2004 9:03:10 AM PDT by freeeee ("Owning" property in the US just means you have one less landlord)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: freeeee
Some people were removed or arrested for one reason and only one reason: they were protesting. THAT is why this isn't a free country

just because i=of this little incident you are saying this isn't a free country? Also I want to know where your outrage is when anti-kerry people are removed because they are protesting. it's happened plenty of times. So I say again get off your F'ing soap box ya' hypocrite.
68 posted on 05/14/2004 9:03:28 AM PDT by armyboy (Posting from Sustainer Army Airfield Balad, Iraq. I'm politically incorrect and damn proud of it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the 9
The problem is that the SS knows it cannot really protect the President from a determined assassin, so they want to create a record 'for the file' of how hard they have tried, just in case.

Exactly what is the connection between protesters and assassination attempts?

Hinkly was posing as a supporter.

This policy has nothing to do with safety and everything to do with a nice clean photo-op.

69 posted on 05/14/2004 9:05:05 AM PDT by freeeee ("Owning" property in the US just means you have one less landlord)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: freeeee
The point of the article was that people who weren't protesting were allowed to stay.

Those with critical views were forced to leave or face arrest.

Those who do not remember history, are condemned to be freeeee.....

70 posted on 05/14/2004 9:06:19 AM PDT by an amused spectator (The SeeBS of 2004 would have revealed the precise date and location of the Normandy Invasion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: GOPrincess
Apparently he's never heard of what it's like when either of the Clintons traveled. Even today I read that signs, etc., are removed from Hillary's presence.

Um, isn't that part of why we don't want to elect Clintons?

71 posted on 05/14/2004 9:06:26 AM PDT by freeeee ("Owning" property in the US just means you have one less landlord)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: freeeee

I wonder how many of these protesters thinks it's just dandy to not allow pro-life demonstraters near abortion clinics. Goose, meet gander.


72 posted on 05/14/2004 9:06:59 AM PDT by discostu (Brick urgently required, must be thick and well kept)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freeeee

Get back to me when they close down LAX again like they did when King Bulbnose had his arse hairs pucked on the tarmac.

Get back to me when they close down LBJ Freeway (!!) in Dallas just because King JizzWhizz needed an entrance and an exit to and from his brother's wedding.


73 posted on 05/14/2004 9:07:47 AM PDT by whereasandsoforth (tagged for migratory purposes only)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: armyboy

"Look pal, When a VIP comes to town stuff gets disrupted, it life. This is about the only country where you could write this about it's leader and not get into trouble. I'm fighting for your right to say those things. if it wasn't for strong leaders like President Bush there would be no America to defend.
So F you and the horse you rode in on..."

Damn right PING!!!


74 posted on 05/14/2004 9:08:00 AM PDT by Christian4Bush (I approve this message: character and integrity matter. Bush/Cheney for '04.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

Comment #75 Removed by Moderator

To: freeeee
But I don't play that game. I don't care who wrote the article

Blah, blah, blah. Yada, yada, yada. Who cares if you are promoting an article by someone who no doubt is among the hate America crowd.

76 posted on 05/14/2004 9:09:02 AM PDT by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: RightthinkinAmerican
Typical Bush-hater hypocrisy. I'm sure things went like clockwork when Clinton travelled.

Guess the author forgot about Clinton's barber appointment at LAX.

77 posted on 05/14/2004 9:09:39 AM PDT by hattend (Only Libs can find mandatory death in the Constitution (see abortion and T. Schiavo))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: freeeee
Continued proof of:


78 posted on 05/14/2004 9:10:23 AM PDT by Johnny Gage (God Bless our Firefighters, our Police, our EMS responders, and our Veterans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TC Rider
The Secret Service is following policies put in place over 10 years ago. I speak from experience in trying to exercize free speach against the Clintons.

The SS does what the pres says. If he says non violent protesters stay then they do.

No president in the last 10 years has any respect for free speech or assembly.

79 posted on 05/14/2004 9:10:34 AM PDT by freeeee ("Owning" property in the US just means you have one less landlord)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: SuziQ

"Guess some folks just have a NEED to complain about anything President Bush does."

Unfortunate but true PING.


80 posted on 05/14/2004 9:10:37 AM PDT by Christian4Bush (I approve this message: character and integrity matter. Bush/Cheney for '04.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 421-438 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson