Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

When King George travels, liberties suffer
The Capital Times ^ | May 13, 2004 | John Nichols

Posted on 05/14/2004 8:20:31 AM PDT by freeeee

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 421-438 next last
To: freeeee

Lets me know this person thinks that they are more important than the President. Reflects the pox of the " ME"generation.


221 posted on 05/14/2004 11:26:02 AM PDT by Ramonan (Compare the Circumstances)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gdani

got any court cases that say the other side can be moved only so far? Didn't think so. As you admitted it has been well established that side CAN be seperated, which is all this is doing. Thus you show how the courts agree with me.


222 posted on 05/14/2004 11:26:36 AM PDT by discostu (Brick urgently required, must be thick and well kept)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies]

To: freeeee

not every court case you disagree with is judicial activism. Sometimes your just plain wrong. This would be one of those times.


223 posted on 05/14/2004 11:27:22 AM PDT by discostu (Brick urgently required, must be thick and well kept)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies]

To: discostu
Not only are your posts becoming more inane (and shrill), they are actually obtuse.

Suffice it to say you have a, ahem,,,, novel,,, interpretation of the first amendment and freedom in general. Carry on.

224 posted on 05/14/2004 11:27:44 AM PDT by Protagoras (When they asked me what I thought of freedom in America,,, I said I thought it would be a good idea.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]

To: Protagoras

My posts are not inane, shrill or obtuse. They are on the point, at least as polite as yours, and have shown quite clearly that you don't know anything about our constitutional garuantee of free speech. My interpetation isn't novel at all, it's perfectly in line with 200+ years of jurisprudence on the subject.


225 posted on 05/14/2004 11:31:34 AM PDT by discostu (Brick urgently required, must be thick and well kept)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies]

To: Ramonan
Lets me know this person thinks that they are more important than the President.

Compared to the right of free speech and assembly, the president and indeed the entire government is a lowly worm.

Their positions exist solely to protect our rights and uphold our Constitution. They are merely public servants, and liberty is their job.

If they think their discomfort at the sight of Americans engaged in their civic duty to influence their government through free speech and assembly is paramount over the liberty that makes this country great, then they have lost sight of their place, and need to be taken down a notch.

226 posted on 05/14/2004 11:33:07 AM PDT by freeeee ("Owning" property in the US just means you have one less landlord)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies]

To: discostu
My posts are not inane, shrill or obtuse

I'm comfortable with readers making their own judgements on those issues. Carry on.

227 posted on 05/14/2004 11:33:15 AM PDT by Protagoras (When they asked me what I thought of freedom in America,,, I said I thought it would be a good idea.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies]

To: freeeee
What petty people. They just hate that the president is getting out of the beltway and mixing it up with some regular folks. Maybe they know that he draws huge enthusiastic crowds wherever he goes. Crowds captured by local media and bypassing the liberal media. GWB should do a lot more of this, particularily in the toss-up states.


228 posted on 05/14/2004 11:33:44 AM PDT by ride the whirlwind (And we will defend the peace that makes all progress possible. - George W. Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freeeee

Ask Don Adams about clinton's visit to Philadelphia aroun 1998.
He got his butt kicked by Union thugs and then was brought to court for it by the D.A.!
Personally, I think beatings are in order for all liberals.
And no, I'm not kidding.


229 posted on 05/14/2004 11:34:46 AM PDT by dyed_in_the_wool (Why do Al Qaeda and DNC press releases always sound the same?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AAABEST
Every single person attacking you would rightuflly howl like little squealing piglets if it were the Klintons prohibiting protest signs.

One day (and no I don't look forward to it) a Dem will be president. And they'll be crying just like they did when Clinton did the same thing. I'm going to ping them all and see what they have to say for themsleves. I predict a very short thread when that happens.

230 posted on 05/14/2004 11:35:53 AM PDT by freeeee ("Owning" property in the US just means you have one less landlord)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: Protagoras; discostu; freeeee
Not only are your(discostu) posts becoming more inane (and shrill), they are actually obtuse.

Disco welcome to the world of Libertarianism on FR. Kinda of a like a mix of 75% of ACLU and 25% of William Buckley.

231 posted on 05/14/2004 11:36:15 AM PDT by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies]

To: Protagoras

Good for you. Got any proof the protester wasn't doing anything else illegal. I will carry on, I will point out your false assumptions and poor Constitutional interpretations every single time I see them. Enjoy.


232 posted on 05/14/2004 11:36:18 AM PDT by discostu (Brick urgently required, must be thick and well kept)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies]

To: dyed_in_the_wool
Personally, I think beatings are in order for all liberals. And no, I'm not kidding.

Looks like you got a 'hole lotta ass kickin' to do, better get started. LOL

You will be doing it yourself won't you?

233 posted on 05/14/2004 11:38:32 AM PDT by Protagoras (When they asked me what I thought of freedom in America,,, I said I thought it would be a good idea.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies]

To: discostu
Got any proof the protester wasn't doing anything else illegal.

I have no proof that he wasn't killing babies while dancing upside down either.

234 posted on 05/14/2004 11:39:51 AM PDT by Protagoras (When they asked me what I thought of freedom in America,,, I said I thought it would be a good idea.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies]

To: Dane

I'm not sure I'd call it libertarianism. But there is a growing number of people who think every time their ability to be heard is impeded it must be a First Ammendment violation. We saw it after 9-11 when editorialists got fired, we saw it when Bill Mahrer lost sponsors for saying the terrorists were brave, we saw it when the Dixie Chicks got boycotted for saying they were ashamed of President Bush. And we see it when people waving protest signs at presidential motorcades get shoved down the block. Everybody claims First Ammendment when ever their speech is annoyed (or annoying). My horn was broken on my car a few months ago and when I took it to the mechanic I made fun of these people by demanding he restore my First Ammendment rights and fix my horn, we laughed.


235 posted on 05/14/2004 11:42:18 AM PDT by discostu (Brick urgently required, must be thick and well kept)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies]

To: Dane
Hey! The saviors of authoritarianism have arrived!

Just get out? Haven't seen you stumbling around here for a while.

BTW, even though you have an obsession about Libertarians, who are you referring to with your comment? Me? Freeee?

236 posted on 05/14/2004 11:42:44 AM PDT by Protagoras (When they asked me what I thought of freedom in America,,, I said I thought it would be a good idea.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies]

To: discostu
But there is a growing number of people who think every time their ability to be heard is impeded it must be a First Ammendment violation

Who? Please name them.

237 posted on 05/14/2004 11:43:31 AM PDT by Protagoras (When they asked me what I thought of freedom in America,,, I said I thought it would be a good idea.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies]

To: Protagoras

but you're perfectly willing to assume the person was arrested for no reason outside of his sign. I'm not willing to make that assumption. The facts as presented say he got arrested, the don't tell us why, until I'm presented with facts that say why I'm not passing judgement either way.


238 posted on 05/14/2004 11:43:57 AM PDT by discostu (Brick urgently required, must be thick and well kept)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies]

To: Protagoras

I did, later in the post. Read the whole thing.


239 posted on 05/14/2004 11:44:30 AM PDT by discostu (Brick urgently required, must be thick and well kept)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies]

To: Ramonan
this person thinks that they are more important than the President

My view is that the President, just like any other elected official, is essentially my hired help.

240 posted on 05/14/2004 11:46:37 AM PDT by Uncle Fud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 421-438 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson