To: syriacus
I think that he was trying to say that after the terrorist used Berg's email account, the address was then passed on, perhaps through forwarding maybe?
Anyway, it seems to me that if his email address was passed on and actually used, there isn't anyway for Berg not to know it is there?
I hate to say it, but I am starting to think Nick Berg was not just some innocent contracter trying to make money.
99 posted on
05/13/2004 10:25:42 PM PDT by
texasflower
(in the event of the rapture.......the Bush White House will be unmanned)
To: texasflower
I hate to say it, but I am starting to think Nick Berg was not just some innocent contracter trying to make money.I think you are right.
And, you can bet your boots that some of the people around him are not innocent, even if he is.
122 posted on
05/13/2004 11:32:13 PM PDT by
syriacus
(Ted Kennedy-did you criticize Clinton and Reno's attack on Waco which resulted in children's deaths?)
To: texasflower
I hate to say it, but I am starting to think Nick Berg was not just some innocent contracter trying to make money.
All signs point to something more sinister. The more I read the more it seems as if he was in Iraq trying to contact AQ and succeeded. The father is involved at some level too. Too many questions: contact with Moussouai, a 'job' as an independent communications worker that provided reason for moving about the country, but is there any confirmation that he actually worked for anyone while he was in Iraq?, and on and on.
To: texasflower
I hate to say it, but I am starting to think Nick Berg was not just some innocent contracter trying to make money. I'm starting to agree with this as well...
201 posted on
05/14/2004 7:25:14 AM PDT by
rintense
(Screw justice. I want revenge.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson