This is so weird.
The normal reaction by a father would be anger, hate and revenge against those that killed his son - the ones that sawed his head off. No normal person would ignore those people saying "I don't blame the terrorists that did this" or "they are probably as bad as he is".
The normal father would be wanting every effort - war included - to go after the men that did this - the ones with the knife.
Something is really fishy here. I am almost beginning to feel the son may have been there for subversive reasons and the "support Bush" was a cover-up of the real purposes.
His father acting like he is indicates a loyalty to the terrorists and a rabid hate for this country and Bush.
Yet - why would they kill one of their own?
As in all mysteries.....he knew too much. Now, don't ask me WHAT he knew...but I'd guess he knew something.
Are we in the Twilight Zone????
As the theory goes...they found out he was Jewish...visited Israel...assumed he was a double agent for Mossad.
He wasn't one of their own. He was first and foremost an American. That in itself is enough. They will use leftist sympathizers to their own means. If it furthers their cause to let them live, then they live. If it furthers their cause to kill them, then they will kill them. That in itself should be enough to shake the answer crowd, but it won't. They will still ultimately blame Bush.
Because appeasement and taking their side doesn't work.
That's the thing: He was an infidel first.
If this stuff about him being a terrorist sympathizer is true, it would hardly matter to Zarqawi. His mission is to kill all the infidels. Nick berg was an infidel. Whether he was an infidel who was interested in appeasement was not really a factor.