Skip to comments.
Call sign: Boston strangler (commander no longer wanted Kerry in his boat group)
American Thinker ^
| May 13th, 2004
| John B. Dwyer
Posted on 05/13/2004 8:25:53 AM PDT by Liz
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
It got to a point where Wright told his divisional commander he no longer wanted Kerry in his boat group, so he was re-assigned to another one. I had an idea of his actions but didnt have to be responsible for him. Then Wright and like-minded boat officers took matters into their own hands. When he got his third Purple Heart, three of us told him to leave. We knew how the system worked and we didnt want him in Coastal Division 11. Kerry didnt manipulate the system, we did.
1
posted on
05/13/2004 8:25:54 AM PDT
by
Liz
To: Mia T
*Surprise*...Loopy was thinking only of himself while in Vietnam.
2
posted on
05/13/2004 8:29:14 AM PDT
by
jla
To: Liz
We knew how the system worked and we didnt want him in Coastal Division 11. Kerry didnt manipulate the system, we did. Translation: Kerry's service in Viet Nam was not honorable - we were compelled to kick him out.
3
posted on
05/13/2004 8:34:58 AM PDT
by
Fenris6
To: Liz
Kerry's nick the Boston Strangler fits him perfectly...........
4
posted on
05/13/2004 8:37:42 AM PDT
by
RoseD
(Oklahoma)
To: Liz
If Kerry actually came by his Purple Heart awards by actually being injured in combat -- and it is becoming increasingly apparent that he did not -- he would have been viewed by his comrades as a "lead magnet," having received three such awards in four months.
Not a guy who would be safe and prudent to be around.
Any way he slices it, Kerry looks to have been more of a liability and a "load" as opposed to a "war hero."
Indeed, the circumstances surrounding the his being awarded a Silver Star for killing a retreating VC bears further examination.....
5
posted on
05/13/2004 8:38:14 AM PDT
by
tracer
To: Liz
When he got his third Purple Heart, three of us told him to leave. We knew how the system worked and we didnt want him in Coastal Division 11. Can't prove this is the right version of events, but it has a ring to it. Backing up a bit...
You had to be right (before opening fire). Kerry seemed to believe there were no rules in a free-fire zone and you were supposed to kill anyone. I didnt see it that way.
This rings very true as well. Liberal activism takes something like the death penalty, makes it useless by drawing out the appeals process twenty years or more per each case, then attacks the institution as useless. That is, the liberals themselves make potential flaws into actual flaws, then attack as flawed the thing they sabotaged.
I can thus believe that Kerry abused free fire zones as random-killing zones, then attacked the concept before the Senate because "some people" were abusing the concept.
6
posted on
05/13/2004 8:40:01 AM PDT
by
VadeRetro
To: Liz
Bump...
To: Liz
Kudos to Mr. Wright for his honorable actions as a military leader in a war zone. And bless him for speaking out about "Three Bandaid" Kerry.
8
posted on
05/13/2004 8:46:43 AM PDT
by
Ciexyz
To: Liz
Unsurprising, considering his current character. Good to see further testimony emerging.
9
posted on
05/13/2004 8:46:51 AM PDT
by
Paul_B
To: Liz
So Kerry acts like a renegade in Vietnam against orders, then gets sent home because of it and as a professional agitator testifies that we have no business being in Vietnam because there are renegades there.
Fascinating (lifts eyebrow).
To: VadeRetro
"This rings very true as well. Liberal activism takes something like the death penalty, makes it useless by drawing out the appeals process twenty years or more per each case, then attacks the institution as useless. That is, the liberals themselves make potential flaws into actual flaws, then attack as flawed the thing they sabotaged."
Plainly stated they are professional deceivers!
To: Liz
Sigh. More dirt that will never see the light of evening news. Speaking of which, we know if Kerry were a Republican, we'd know all there is to know about Theresa Heinz. Coming from a white South Afican family, were her forebearers staunch opponents or supporters of apartheid? Does anyone know, or have all the witnesses and documents on the subject mysteriously disappeared?
12
posted on
05/13/2004 8:49:31 AM PDT
by
Spok
(They call me old Hugh, but I doubt I'm 80.)
To: Liz
This suggests a possibly very interesting version of events, and how Kerry got that extra purple heart. Maybe, someone among these officers who wanted Kerry gone knew he'd put in for the first purple heart and been turned down. And knew about the "3 purple hearts and out" regulation. Just maybe Kerry's not lying about how the he ended up with the first one: the guys told the boss who replaced Hibbert to get rid of Kerry, and showed him how to do it without hurting anyone by giving Keryy the needed purple heart he'd already been rejected for. It does fit the facts, except Kerry's medals. Perhaps, those, too, were a way to make sure no one would question Kerry's being sent home since he was a "hero". Interesting.
13
posted on
05/13/2004 8:50:39 AM PDT
by
CatoRenasci
(Ceterum Censeo Arabiam Esse Delendam -- Forsan et haec olim meminisse iuvabit)
To: CapandBall
Turns out, Kerry was in Vietnam. And some of his peers didn't like him...
14
posted on
05/13/2004 8:51:45 AM PDT
by
m1911
To: Liz
I had a lot of trouble getting him to follow orders, recalls Wright. He had a different view of leadership and operations. Those of us with direct experience working with Kerry found him difficult and oriented towards his personal, rather than unit goals and objectives."...Kinda says it all, doesn't it?
Some things never change in people's personalities. Sounds like the Clintons.
To: Liz
Reference bump.
To: Liz
I don't buy that....Kerry knew exactly what he was doing, putting in for medals for cuts and scrapes. He was leaving after that 3rd PH, whether they told him to or not, IMHO.
17
posted on
05/13/2004 8:53:35 AM PDT
by
MamaLucci
(Libs, want answers on 911? Ask Clinton why he met with Monica more than with his CIA director.)
To: VadeRetro
liberals themselves make potential flaws into actual flaws, then attack as flawed the thing they sabotaged. You're right. The greenies have sabotoged the nuclear industry in the US, burdening it with about an order of magnitude to many people and paperwork.
Then they gripe because the nuclear industry can't deliver it's once promised goal of "providing electricity so cheap, you wouldn't have to meter it".
Despite the over-regulation, nukes are still the cheapest per kilowatt.
18
posted on
05/13/2004 8:56:48 AM PDT
by
narby
(Iraq prison abuse looks like Frat house hazing to me.)
To: narby
The greenies have sabotoged the nuclear industry in the US, burdening it with about an order of magnitude to many people and paperwork. Yeah. Again and again they do this. It often amounts to saying, "You'll have to kill all us liberals to make this work!" (Sometimes it's a good thing it's not up to me.)
To: Interesting Times
I thought you might want to list this one!
Regards,
TS
20
posted on
05/13/2004 9:02:09 AM PDT
by
The Shrew
(A dollar a day won't cure your addiction to FR but it will make you feel better. Join me!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson